Comparison between the classical and a modified trans-septal technique of alar cinching for Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective randomized controlled trial

被引:17
作者
Nirvikalpa, N. [1 ]
Narayanan, V. [1 ]
Wahab, A. [1 ]
Ramadorai, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Madras 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
alar cinch suture; Le Fort I osteotomy; nasal width; alar cinching; modified; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT; BASE CINCH; NASAL; PREVENTION; MORPHOLOGY; AESTHETICS; SUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.027
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this prospective randomized control trial was to analyse the efficacy of a new trans-septal alar base cinch suture in controlling alar width in patients undergoing maxillary intrusion and setback by comparing it with the traditional cinch suture. Statistical evaluation was carried out in 62 of 76 patients. Group I (31 patients) received the traditional alar base cinch suture, and group II (31 patients) received the alar base cinch suture with an anchoring bite taken through the nasal septum 10 mm behind its anterior edge. In both groups the accurate identification of alar fibroareolar tissue was facilitated by an 18 gauge green needle passed extra orally. Alar base width was measured before and 6 months after surgery using Vernier callipers. Preoperative alar base width for group I was 29.76 mm (1.901 SD) and for group II 29.79 mm (3.141 SD); the postoperative values were 32.42 mm (1.858 SD) and 29.94 mm (2.568 SD), respectively. Mean alar base widening was 2.661 mm (0.800 SD) in group I and 0.145 mm (2.050) in group II. The difference in alar widening was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the trans-septal modified alar cinch suture offers better control of alar base architecture in maxillary intrusion and setback.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Nasal deformities associated with orthognathic surgery: Analysis, prevention, and correction [J].
Altman, Jason I. ;
Oeltjen, John C. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 18 (04) :734-739
[2]  
[Anonymous], J CRANIOMAXILLOFAC S
[3]  
Betts N J, 1993, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V8, P7
[4]   THE ALAR BASE CINCH - A TECHNIQUE FOR PREVENTION OF ALAR BASE FLARING SECONDARY TO MAXILLARY SURGERY [J].
COLLINS, PC ;
EPKER, BN .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1982, 53 (06) :549-553
[5]  
DANN JJ, 1976, J ORAL SURG, V34, P19
[6]   Nasal airway changes after Le Fort I -: Impaction and advancement:: anatomical and functional findings [J].
Erbe, M ;
Lehotay, M ;
Göde, U ;
Wigand, ME ;
Neukam, FW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (02) :123-129
[7]  
FREIHOFER H P M JR, 1976, Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, V4, P136
[8]   CHANGES IN NASAL PROFILE AFTER MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT IN CLEFT AND NON-CLEFT PATIENTS [J].
FREIHOFER, HPM .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1977, 5 (01) :20-27
[9]   A LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF NASAL MORPHOLOGY FOLLOWING LEFORT-1 OSTEOTOMY APPLYING PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES [J].
GASSMANN, CJ ;
NISHIOKA, GJ ;
VANSICKELS, JE ;
THRASH, WJ .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1989, 47 (09) :926-930
[10]  
GUYMON M, 1988, International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, V3, P89