Modeling Dynamic Fragmentation of Soil

被引:12
作者
Bird, N. R. A. [1 ]
Watts, C. W. [1 ]
Tarquis, A. M. [2 ,3 ]
Whitmore, A. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Soil Sci, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dpto Matemat Aplicada Ingn Agron, ETS Ingn Agron, Madrid, Spain
[3] UPM, CEIGRAM, Madrid, Spain
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.2136/vzj2008.0046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil fragmentation is a critical component in determining the structure of soil at any instant intime. Modeling and describing soil fragmentation consequently occupies an important niche in soil research. Recent attention has focused on a simple deterministic model of soil fragmentation that encompasses the notion of scale invariance and yields characteristic power-law or fractal size distributions. This model lacks a temporal component, which means that its applicability to a host of real scenarios, involving progressive comminution of soil intime, appears restricted. Our purpose in this study was to generalize this deterministic approach to modeling fragmentation by explicitly including time and by relaxing the requirement for scale invariance. We examined the consequences of these simple modifications in terms of the evolving fragment size distributions. We investigated the development of three different outcomes. The first is a skewed unimodal distribution of the logarithm of fragment size. The second is a unimodal distribution well approximated by the lognormal distribution, and the third is a local power-law distribution. The outcome was dependent on the choice of how fragmentation was modeled as a function of scale. We concluded that power-law distributions should be regarded as the exception rather than the rule in a temporal fragmentation of soil and that we should expect to find power-law scaling locally rather than across the full range of fragment sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 201
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1941, Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
[2]   Characterization of particle-size distribution in soils with a fragmentation model [J].
Bittelli, M ;
Campbell, GS ;
Flury, M .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (04) :782-788
[3]   FRACTAL DESCRIPTION OF SOIL FRAGMENTATION FOR VARIOUS TILLAGE METHODS AND CROP SEQUENCES [J].
EGHBALL, B ;
MIELKE, LN ;
CALVO, GA ;
WILHELM, WW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1993, 57 (05) :1337-1341
[4]   LOGARITHMICO-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION IN BREAKAGE OF SOLIDS [J].
EPSTEIN, B .
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1948, 40 (12) :2289-2291
[5]  
Gardner W. R., 1956, Soil Science Society of America. Proceedings, V20, P151
[6]   A modified number-based method for estimating fragmentation fractal dimensions of soils [J].
Kozak, E ;
Pachepsky, YA ;
Sokolowski, S ;
Sokolowska, Z ;
Stepniewski, W .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1996, 60 (05) :1291-1297
[7]   Fractal models for the fragmentation of rocks and soils: a review [J].
Perfect, E .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1997, 48 (3-4) :185-198
[8]   A prefractal model for predicting soil fragment mass-size distributions [J].
Perfect, E ;
Díaz-Zorita, M ;
Grove, JH .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2002, 64 (1-2) :79-90
[9]   FRACTAL THEORY APPLIED TO SOIL AGGREGATION [J].
PERFECT, E ;
KAY, BD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1991, 55 (06) :1552-1558
[10]   MULTIFRACTAL MODEL FOR SOIL AGGREGATE FRAGMENTATION [J].
PERFECT, E ;
KAY, BD ;
RASIAH, V .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1993, 57 (04) :896-900