Analysing the Combined Effect of Barrier Wall and Freshwater Injection Countermeasures on Controlling Saltwater Intrusion in Unconfined Coastal Aquifer Systems

被引:53
作者
Armanuos, Asaad M. [1 ]
Ibrahim, Mona G. [2 ]
Mahmod, Wael Elham [2 ,3 ]
Takemura, Jiro [4 ]
Yoshimura, C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Irrigat & Hydraul Engn, Tanta, Egypt
[2] Egypt Japan Univ Sci & Technol, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Assiut Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Asyut, Egypt
[4] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Meguro Ku, 2-12-1 Oookayama, Tokyo 1528552, Japan
[5] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Meguro Ku, 2-12-1 Oookayama, Tokyo 1520033, Japan
关键词
Saltwater intrusion; Freshwater injection; Barrier wall; Combination;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-019-2184-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Freshwater recharge wells and underground flow barriers are among several methods proposed for controlling saltwater intrusion (SWI) into coastal aquifers. In this study, experimental and numerical studies were performed to determine the effect of using a flow barrier wall, a recharge well and a combination of these, to control SWI in unconfined coastal aquifer systems. The SEAWAT model was used to predict the SWI wedge and the behaviour of the retreating residual saltwater after installing the remediation measures. The results show that increasing the barrier wall embedment ratio (d(b)/d) from 0.44 to 0.67 led to an increase in the repulsion ratio (R) from 20.8 to 46.87%. Moreover, increasing the freshwater injection rate ratio (Q(i)/Q) from 0.22 to 0.56 increased the repulsion ratio (R) from 10.93 to 22.39%. Barrier wall embedment with ratios (d(b)/d) of 0.44, 0.51 and 0.57, combined with a freshwater injection ratio (Q(i)/Q) with a value of 0.56, achieved (R) of 41.14, 45.41 and 50.0%, compared with 20.8, 27.1 and 34.40% for the barrier wall only and 22.39% for freshwater injection only. Freshwater injection ratios (Q(i)/Q) of 0.22, 0.33, 0.44 and 0.56 combined with a barrier wall embedment ratio (d(b)/d) of 0.508 achieved repulsion ratios (R) of 33.9, 36.5, 39.0 and 45.42%, compared with 10.9, 15.6, 18.8 and 22.4% respectively for freshwater injection only and 27.1% for the barrier wall only. A combination of flow barrier and freshwater injection forced the saltwater to retreat and achieved values of R greater than either the barrier wall or freshwater injection separately.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1280
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A new physical barrier system for seawater intrusion control [J].
Abdoulhalik, Antoifi ;
Ahmed, Ashraf ;
Hamill, G. A. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2017, 549 :416-427
[2]   The effectiveness of cutoff walls to control saltwater intrusion in multi-layered coastal aquifers: Experimental and numerical study [J].
Abdoulhalik, Antoifi ;
Ahmed, Ashraf A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 199 :62-73
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, C CLASS 5 UIC STUD F
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, V80, P1, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324
[6]   THE EFFECT OF A SUBSURFACE BARRIER ON THE CONSERVATION OF FRESH-WATER IN COASTAL AQUIFERS [J].
ANWAR, HO .
WATER RESEARCH, 1983, 17 (10) :1257-1265
[7]  
Attanayake P., 2007, A new focus on groundwater-seawater interactions, P237
[8]  
Bear J., 2012, Hydraulics of groundwater
[9]  
BRUINGTON AE, 1965, J IRRIG DRAIN DIV AS, V91, P117
[10]   Experimental and numerical investigation of saltwater intrusion dynamics in flux-controlled groundwater systems [J].
Chang, Sun Woo ;
Clement, T. Prabhakar .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48