Age Invariance in Feeling of Knowing During Implicit Interference Effects

被引:9
作者
Eakin, Deborah K. [1 ]
Hertzog, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Psychol, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2012年 / 67卷 / 05期
关键词
Associate set size; Feeling of knowing; Interference; Metamemory; ENCODING CONTEXT; CUE-FAMILIARITY; MEMORY; RECALL; METAMEMORY; JUDGMENTS; ACCURACY; ILLUSIONS; RESOLUTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1093/geronb/gbr150
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives. Prior research found age invariance in accuracy of delayed judgments of learning accuracy (Eakin, D. K., & Hertzog, C. [2006]. Release from implicit interference in memory and metamemory: Older adults know that they can't let go. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 340-347). We tested whether aging affects accuracy of feeling of knowing (FOK) predictions under implicit interference. Discrepancies in the literature suggest that FOKs sometimes are and sometimes are not affected by aging. In addition, because the effects of implicit interference are different on recognition than on recall, older adults may have difficulty ignoring the impact of interference on recall in order to accurately predict the lack of interference effects on recognition. Method. Younger and older adults studied cue-target pairs and cue set size varied. After a cued recall test, they made FOKs about future recognition of the target given the cue and then took a recognition test. Results. Neither younger nor older adults were able to predict recognition of unrecalled items. FOKs were more correlated with recall than with recognition for both age groups. Although both recall and recognition varied with age, no age differences were obtained in FOK accuracy. Discussion. FOK accuracy was not impaired with age, even when memory was. FOKs of both younger and older adults reflected implicit interference effects in recall, not recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 562
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [41] Glucose administration and cognitive function: differential effects of age and effort during a dual task paradigm in younger and older adults
    Macpherson, Helen
    Roberstson, Bernadette
    Suenram-Lea, Sandra
    Stough, Con
    Kennedy, David
    Scholey, Andrew
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 232 (06) : 1135 - 1142
  • [42] Age differences in fear retention and extinction in male Sprague-Dawley rats: Effects of ethanol challenge during conditioning
    Broadwater, Margaret
    Spear, Linda P.
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 252 : 377 - 387
  • [43] Effects of gestational age on brain volume and cognitive functions in generally healthy very preterm born children during school-age: A voxel-based morphometry study
    Lemola, Sakari
    Oser, Nadine
    Urfer-Maurer, Natalie
    Brand, Serge
    Holsboer-Trachsler, Edith
    Bechtel, Nina
    Grob, Alexander
    Weber, Peter
    Datta, Alexandre N.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [44] Effects of maternal folic acid supplementation during pregnancy on infant neurodevelopment at 1 month of age: a birth cohort study in China
    Yan, Jing
    Zhu, Yun
    Cao, Lu-Jia
    Liu, Yu-Yan
    Zheng, Yu-Zhi
    Li, Wen
    Huang, Guo-Wei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2020, 59 (04) : 1345 - 1356
  • [45] How Does Explicit Prioritization Alter Walking During Dual-Task Performance? Effects of Age and Sex on Gait Speed and Variability
    Yogev-Seligmann, Galit
    Rotem-Galili, Yael
    Mirelman, Anat
    Dickstein, Ruth
    Giladi, Nir
    Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2010, 90 (02): : 177 - 186
  • [46] Comparison between hemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopental during general anesthesia induction with remifentanil infusion: a double-blind, age-stratified, randomized study
    Hino, Hideki
    Matsuura, Tadashi
    Kihara, Yuki
    Tsujikawa, Shogo
    Mori, Takashi
    Nishikawa, Kiyonobu
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (04) : 509 - 515