Velocity- and power-load relationships in the half, parallel and full back squat

被引:91
作者
Martinez-Cava, Alejandro [1 ]
Moran-Navarro, Ricardo [1 ]
Sanchez-Medina, Luis [2 ]
Jose Gonzalez-Badillo, Juan [3 ]
Pallares, Jesus G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Human Performance & Sports Sci Lab, Fac Sport Sci, C Argentina S-N, Murcia, Spain
[2] Govt Navarre, Ctr Studies Res & Sports Med, Pamplona, Spain
[3] Pablo de Olavide Univ, Fac Sport, Seville, Spain
关键词
Resistance training; muscle strength; force platform; propulsive phase; squat depth; lumbar spine; NET VERTICAL IMPULSE; ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT VELOCITY; STICKING POINT; STRENGTH; MUSCLE; EXERCISE; KNEE; KINEMATICS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/02640414.2018.1544187
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
This study aimed to compare the load-velocity and load-power relationships of three common variations of the squat exercise. 52 strength-trained males performed a progressive loading test up to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the full (F-SQ), parallel (P-SQ) and half (H-SQ) squat, conducted in random order on separate days. Bar velocity and vertical force were measured by means of a linear velocity transducer time-synchronized with a force platform. The relative load that maximized power output (Pmax) was analyzed using three outcome measures: mean concentric (MP), mean propulsive (MPP) and peak power (PP), while also including or excluding body mass in force calculations. 1RM was significantly different between exercises. Load-velocity and load-power relationships were significantly different between the F-SQ, P-SQ and H-SQ variations. Close relationships (R-2 = 0.92-0.96) between load (%1RM) and bar velocity were found and they were specific for each squat variation, with faster velocities the greater the squat depth. Unlike the F-SQ and P-SQ, no sticking region was observed for the H-SQ when lifting high loads. The Pmax corresponded to a broad load range and was greatly influenced by how force output is calculated (including or excluding body mass) as well as the exact outcome variable used (MP, MPP, PP).
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1096
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   COMPARISON BETWEEN BENCH PRESS THROW AND BALLISTIC PUSH-UP TESTS TO ASSESS UPPER-BODY POWER IN TRAINED INDIVIDUALS [J].
Bartolomei, Sandro ;
Nigro, Federico ;
Ruggeri, Sandro ;
Lanzoni, Ivan Malagoli ;
Ciacci, Simone ;
Merni, Franco ;
Sadres, Eliahu ;
Hoffman, Jay R. ;
Semprini, Gabriele .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2018, 32 (06) :1503-1510
[2]   Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads [J].
Bazrgari, Babak ;
Shirazi-Adl, Aboulfazl ;
Arjmand, Navid .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (05) :687-699
[3]   Effect of range of motion in heavy load squatting on muscle and tendon adaptations [J].
Bloomquist, K. ;
Langberg, H. ;
Karlsen, S. ;
Madsgaard, S. ;
Boesen, M. ;
Raastad, T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 113 (08) :2133-2142
[4]  
BoWERMan E., 2013, NZ J SPORTS MED, V40, P70
[5]  
CHANDLER TJ, 1989, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V21, P299
[6]  
Donnelly DV, 2006, J STRENGTH COND RES, V20, P145
[7]  
Drinkwater EJ, 2007, J STRENGTH COND RES, V21, P510
[8]   Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strain and Tensile Forces for Weight-Bearing and Non-Weight-Bearing Exercises: A Guide to Exercise Selection [J].
Escamilla, Rafael F. ;
MacLeod, Toran D. ;
Wilk, Kevin E. ;
Paulos, Lonnie ;
Andrews, James R. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 42 (03) :208-220
[9]   Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises [J].
Escamilla, RF ;
Fleisig, GS ;
Zheng, NG ;
Barrentine, SW ;
Wilk, KE ;
Andrews, JR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1998, 30 (04) :556-569
[10]   A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths [J].
Escamilla, RF ;
Fleisig, GS ;
Lowry, TM ;
Barrentine, SW ;
Andrews, JR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (06) :984-998