NURSING RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN INDONESIA AS PERCEIVED BY NURSES

被引：6

作者：

Lusmilasari, Lely ^{[1
]}

Aungsuroch, Yupin ^{[2
]}

Widyawati ^{[1
]}

Sukratul, Sunisa ^{[1
]}

Gunawan, Joko ^{[2
]}

Perdana, Melyza ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Med Publ Hlth & Nursing, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Nursing, Borommaratchachonnani Srisataphat Bldg,Rama 1 Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

来源：

BELITUNG NURSING JOURNAL | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期

关键词：

nursing research; qualitative research; focus groups; nursing process; nursing services; TECHNOLOGY;

D O I：

10.33546/bnj.1055

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Background: To promote excellence in nursing research, setting research priorities is needed to meet the need of community aligned with the national context. Unfortunately, limited number of studies has examined nursing research priorities in Indonesia. Objective: To identify nursing research priorities in Indonesia from the perspectives of nursing experts. Methods: This was a descriptive qualitative study. Focus group discussion was conducted among participants who were purposively selected (n = 13). Data were analyzed using a consensus-based method. Results: The top ten research priority lists were identified. The priorities were nurse competence, quality of nursing care in nursing services, nursing policy, nurse work environment, nurse mobility, interprofessional education and collaboration, teaching learning evaluation, nursing career, complementary therapy in nursing, and technology and informatics in nursing. Conclusion: Findings of this study could be used as the basis of direction for development of future research in Indonesia.

引用

页码：41 / 46

页数：6

共 28 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2009, AM J PHARM EDUC

[2] Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care [J].

Archibald, Mandy M. ;

Barnard, Alan .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (11-12) :2473-2480

[3]

Aungsuroch Y., 2019, Frontiers of Nursing, V6, P249, DOI [10.2478/FON-2019-0044, DOI 10.2478/FON-2019-0044]

[4] DOING COMPETENCIES WELL: BEST PRACTICES IN COMPETENCY MODELING [J].

Campion, Michael A. ;

Fink, Alexis A. ;

Ruggeberg, Brian J. ;

Carr, Linda ;

Phillips, Geneva M. ;

Odman, Ronald B. .

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (01) :225-262

[5] Standards for practice for registered nurses in Australia [J].

Cashin, Andrew ;

Heartfield, Marie ;

Bryce, Julianne ;

Devey, Lisa ;

Buckley, Thomas ;

Cox, Darlene ;

Kerdo, Eleanor ;

Kelly, John ;

Cox, Darlene ;

Fisher, Murray .

COLLEGIAN, 2017, 24 (03) :255-266

[6]

Chang Pao-Long, 2007, J Nurs Manag, V15, P801, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2007.00772.x

[7]

Doran D.M., 2010, Nursing outcomes: the state of the science- 2th ed, V2nd

[8] Competency assessment tools: An exploration of the pedagogical issues facing competency assessment for nurses in the clinical environment [J].

Franklin, Natasha ;

Melville, Paula .

COLLEGIAN, 2015, 22 (01) :25-31

[9]

Gunawan J., 2016, J BELITUNG NURS J, V2, P8, DOI DOI 10.33546/BNJ.8

[10]

Gunawan J, 2015, Int J Res Med Sci, V3, P1571, DOI [10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150231, DOI 10.18203/2320-6012.IJRMS20150231]

← 1 2 3 →