SMALLHOLDER ADOPTION OF GREEN PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON THE NORTH CHINA PLAIN: EVIDENCE FROM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BACKYARDS

被引:5
作者
Li, Yajuan [1 ]
Huang, Qianni [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,Minist Educ, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
关键词
agricultural socialized services; green production technologies; green transfor-mation of agriculture; technology adoption; technology trust; NITROGEN-USE EFFICIENCY; AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION; CROP YIELD; TOP-DOWN; SYSTEM; MAIZE; WHEAT; DIFFUSION; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2022461
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Understanding the impact of agricultural socialized services on smallholder adoption of green production technologies and their mechanisms of action is of great importance for sustainability of farming systems. Currently, there were numerous related studies, but it is still unclear how to gradually achieve the diffusion of technological innovations on pilot sites to a regional level. To answer this question, this paper presents the pathways and mechanisms of green production technologies diffusion by comparing international typical service organizations or modes such as agricultural technology extension service centers (ATESC), farmer field schools (FFS), participatory technology innovation (PTI) and integrated colearning approach (ICLA), while taking Wangzhuang Science and Technology Backyard (WZ STB) in Quzhou, Hebei Province, China as an example. This research had three key outcomes. (1) The combination of collaborative, tree-shaped and jump-start diffusion modes promotes the diffusion of participatory technology innovation to different scales, such as farmers, villages and counties. (2) The three diffusion modes combine and expand the advantages of existing international modes. The collaborative diffusion mode not only provides full scope for the advantages of PTI, but also provides smallholders with service supply for the whole production period. The tree-shaped diffusion mode combines the advantages of FFS from point technology innovation to village diffusion, while achieving a full range of technical service support. The jump-start diffusion mode cannot only achieve large-scale technology diffusion like ATESC and ICLA, but also empower smallholders through adaptive technology innovation. (3) Trust is the key to promoting smallholder reliance on the science and technology provided by STB and to promote their adoption of green production technologies. Accordingly, the following policy recommendations were proposed: strengthen the combination of top-down and bottom-up technology innovation and diffusion models, establish an effective service communication platform and evaluation mechanism, and strengthen the linkage mechanism between socialized services providers and smallholders, which will provide a realistic basis for the national policy of targeted socialized services provision and promote smallholder adoption of green production technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 546
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Mutual proximity and heterogeneity in peer effects of farmers' technology adoption: evidence from China's soil testing and formulated fertilization program
    Xu, Zhigang
    Zhang, Kerong
    Zhou, Li
    Ying, Ruiyao
    [J]. CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 14 (02) : 395 - 415
  • [32] Environmental values, social networks, and farmers' soil testing and formulated fertilization technology adoption: evidence from China
    Wang, Jian
    Liu, Ruifeng
    Tian, Mengling
    Liang, Fei
    Ren, Wei
    Ma, Hengyun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [33] Will the Adoption of Early Fertigation Techniques Hinder Famers' Technology Renewal? Evidence from Fresh Growers in Shaanxi, China
    Yuan, Jiahong
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Sun, Zilai
    Ruan, Junhu
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [34] Socioeconomic status, ambidextrous learning, and farmers' adoption of biological control technology: evidence from 650 kiwifruit growers in China
    Chen, Zhe
    Li, Xiaojing
    Xia, Xianli
    [J]. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 78 (02) : 475 - 487
  • [35] Optimizing wheat production and reducing environmental impacts through scientist-farmer engagement: Lessons from the North China Plain
    Jiang, Wei
    Zhu, Annah
    Wang, Chong
    Zhang, Fusuo
    Jiao, Xiaoqiang
    [J]. FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2021, 10 (01):
  • [36] Social capital, land tenure and the adoption of green control techniques by family farms: Evidence from Shandong and Henan Provinces of China
    Gao, Yang
    Liu, Bei
    Yu, Lili
    Yang, Haoran
    Yin, Shijiu
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 89
  • [37] The Impact of the Voluntary Environmental Agreements on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence From the Prefectural-Level Data in China
    Ren, Kai
    Kong, Yu-Sheng
    Imran, Muhammad
    Bangash, Arshad Khan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [38] Off-farm work, adoption of resource-conservation technology, and farm performance: evidence from banana farmers in China
    Huang, Enlin
    Zhu, Yueji
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [39] Policy setting, heterogeneous scale, and willingness to adopt green production behavior: field evidence from cooperatives in China
    Zhu, Zheyi
    Che, Yuxin
    Ning, Ke
    Liu, Zengjin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (01) : 1529 - 1555
  • [40] Are Socialized Services of Agricultural Green Production Conducive to the Reduction in Fertilizer Input? Empirical Evidence from Rural China
    Yang, Chunfang
    Zeng, Hengyuan
    Zhang, Yifeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)