Craniofacial structure variations in patients with palatal anomalies and velopharyngeal dysfunction

被引:3
|
作者
Nachmani, Ariela [1 ,2 ]
Aizenbud, Dror [3 ]
Nageris, Ben [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Emodi, Omri [6 ]
Kassem, Firas [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Meir Med Ctr, Ctr Cleft Palate & Craniofacial Anomalies, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Kefar Sava, Israel
[2] Hadassah Acad Coll, Commun Disorders Fac, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Rappaport Fac Med, Orthodont & Craniofacial Ctr, Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
[4] Meir Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Kefar Sava, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[6] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Rappaport Fac Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial, Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Cleft lip and palate; Occult submucous cleft palate; Velopharyngeal dysfunction; Craniofacial morphology; Cephalometry; SUBMUCOUS CLEFT-PALATE; PHARYNGEAL FLAP; CRANIAL BASE; SPHINCTER PHARYNGOPLASTY; CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; CHILDREN; SPEECH; GROWTH; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial and craniopharyngeal morphology is important for understanding the factors affecting velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) in patients with palatal anomalies. Materials and methods: In this study, 366 patients with VPD were retrospectively stratified into cleft lip and palate (CLP), cleft palate (CP), submucous cleft palate (SMCP), occult submucous cleft palate (OSMCP), and non-CP groups. Lateral cephalometrics were used to assess craniofacial, craniopharyngeal, and velopharyngeal anatomy. Results: The average craniofacial morphology in patients with VPD differed significantly according to the type of palatal anomaly. The non-CP and OSMCP groups differed from the CLP, CP, and SMCP groups in nasopharyngeal size and shape as depicted by a larger ANS-Ptm-Ve angle, a smaller S-N-Ba and NBa -PP angles, and a shorter linear value of S-Ar in the non-CP group. The CLP and CP groups had shorter ANS-Ptm, shorter Ptm-P, and smaller SNA and SNB angles. Conclusion: VPD patients with overt clefts have different skeletal and nasopharyngeal shapes compared to non-CP and OSMCP. Velopharyngeal function assessment should include the size and shape of the nasopharyngeal space in addition to the size and the activity of the velum and posterior and lateral walls of the nasopharynx. This should enable a more precise understanding of VPD pathology, and lead to improvements in the posterior pharyngeal flap technique in order to obtain better postoperative speech outcomes after surgical management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. (C) 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 209
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Differences in craniofacial morphology between platybasic and nonplatybasic patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction and control subjects
    Nachmani, Ariela
    Masalha, Muhamed
    Biadsee, Ameen
    Nageris, Ben
    Ben-Dov, Tom
    Kassem, Firas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 162 (01) : E5 - E16
  • [2] Is there a correlation between skull base flexure and palatal anomalies in patients with 22q11 deletion syndrome and velopharyngeal dysfunction?
    Kassem, Firas
    Masalha, Muhamed
    Gothelf, Doron
    Kassem, Eias
    Nageris, Ben
    Nachmani, Ariela
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 49 (09) : 823 - 829
  • [3] Research Article Compensatory Articulation Errors in Patients With Velopharyngeal Dysfunction and Palatal Anomalies
    Nachmani, Ariela
    Biadsee, Ameen
    Masalha, Muhamed
    Kassem, Firas
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 65 (07): : 2518 - 2539
  • [4] Characterizing age at velopharyngeal dysfunction in patients with cleft palates
    Varagur, Kaamya
    Chryssofos, Sophia
    Douglas, T. Owen
    Grames, Lynn M.
    Skolnick, Gary B.
    Naidoo, Sybill D.
    Snyder-Warwick, Alison K.
    Patel, Kamlesh B.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 102 : 123 - 130
  • [5] Variations in Velopharyngeal Structure in Adults With Repaired Cleft Palate
    Perry, Jamie L.
    Kotlarek, Katelyn J.
    Sutton, Bradley P.
    Kuehn, David P.
    Jaskolka, Michael S.
    Fang, Xiangming
    Point, Stuart W.
    Rauccio, Frank
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (10) : 1409 - 1418
  • [6] Treatment algorithm for velopharyngeal dysfunction in patients with cleft palate: a systematic review
    Asar, Aseel
    Gaber, Ramy
    Yehia, Mahmoud
    El-Kassaby, Marwa A. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 61 (04) : 259 - 266
  • [7] Influence of Primary Palatal Surgery on Craniofacial Morphology in Patients with Cleft Palate Only (CPO)-Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
    Grocholewicz, Katarzyna
    Mazur, Marta
    Jedlinski, Maciej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [8] Palatal Re-Repair With Z-Plasty in Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency of Syndromic and Nonsyndromic Patients With Cleft Palate
    Ahti, Veera
    Alaluusua, Suvi
    Vuola, Pia
    Rautio, Jorma
    Leikola, Junnu
    Saarikko, Anne
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (02) : 685 - 690
  • [9] Speech Outcomes Following Orticochea Pharyngoplasty in Patients With History of Cleft Palate and Noncleft Velopharyngeal Dysfunction
    Birch, Alison L.
    Jordan, Zoe, V
    Ferguson, Louisa M.
    Kelly, Clare B.
    Boorman, John G.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (03) : 277 - 290
  • [10] Management of acquired cholesteatoma in patients with craniofacial anomalies: An institutional experience
    Manzoni Lourencone, Luiz Fernando
    Batistao, Guilherme Trindade
    Rillo Dutka, Jeniffer de Cassia
    de Brito, Rubens
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06)