Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Grassland Production in China: A Meta-Analysis

被引:110
作者
Yan, Liang [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Guangsheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, State Key Lab Vegetat & Environm Change, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; LITTER QUALITY; INNER-MONGOLIA; CARBON STOCKS; RESPONSES; ECOSYSTEMS; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0081466
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Grazing is one of the main grassland disturbances in China, and it is essential to quantitatively evaluate the effects of different grazing intensities on grassland production for grassland carbon budget and sustainable use. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted to reveal general response patterns of grassland production to grazing in China. We used weighted log response ratio to assess the effect size, and 95% confidence intervals to give a sense of the precision of the estimate. Grazing effects were estimated as a percentage change relative to control (%). Results: A total of 48 studies, including 251 data sets, were included in the meta-analysis. Grazing significantly decreased total biomass by 58.34% (95% CI: -72.04%similar to-37.94%, CI: Confidence Interval), increased root/shoot ratio by 30.58% and decreased litter by 51.41% (95% CI: -63.31%similar to-35.64%). Aboveground biomass and belowground biomass decreased significantly by 42.77% (95% CI: -48.88%similar to-35.93%) and 23.13% (95% CI: -39.61%similar to-2.17%), respectively. However, biomass responses were dependent on grazing intensity and environmental conditions. Percentage changes in aboveground biomass to grazing showed a quadratic relationship with precipitation in light grazing intensity treatment and a linear relationship in moderate and heavy grazing intensity treatment, but did not change with temperature. Grazing effects on belowground biomass did not change with precipitation or temperature. Compared to the global average value, grazing had greater negative effects on grassland production in China. Conclusions: Grazing has negative effects on grassland biomass and the grazing effects change with environmental conditions and grazing intensity, therefore flexible rangeland management tactics that suit local circumstances are necessary to take into consideration for balancing the demand of grassland utilization and conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Effect of grazing on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland
    Altesor, A
    Oesterheld, M
    Leoni, E
    Lezama, F
    Rodríguez, C
    [J]. PLANT ECOLOGY, 2005, 179 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [2] [Anonymous], CHINESE RESOURCES SC
  • [3] [Anonymous], EFFECTS HIST CHANGE
  • [4] [Anonymous], GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, GRASSLANDS WORLD FAO
  • [6] Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient
    Bai, Yongfei
    Wu, Jianguo
    Clark, Chris M.
    Pan, Qingmin
    Zhang, Lixia
    Chen, Shiping
    Wang, Qibing
    Han, Xingguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2012, 49 (06) : 1204 - 1215
  • [7] Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities
    Bardgett, RD
    Wardle, DA
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2003, 84 (09) : 2258 - 2268
  • [8] Changes in plant functional groups, litter quality, and soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization with sheep grazing in an Inner Mongolian Grassland
    Barger, NN
    Ojima, DS
    Belnap, J
    Wang, SP
    Wang, YF
    Chen, ZZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 57 (06): : 613 - 619
  • [9] DOES HERBIVORY BENEFIT PLANTS - A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE
    BELSKY, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1986, 127 (06) : 870 - 892
  • [10] Plant-soil interactions in temperate grasslands
    Burke, IC
    Lauenroth, WK
    Vinton, MA
    Hook, PB
    Kelly, RH
    Epstein, HE
    Aguiar, MR
    Robles, MD
    Aguilera, MO
    Murphy, KL
    Gill, RA
    [J]. BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 42 (1-2) : 121 - 143