Interfascial Plane Blocks Reduce Postoperative Pain and Morphine Consumption in Thoracic Outlet Decompression

被引:10
作者
Goeteyn, Jens [1 ]
van den Broek, Renee [2 ]
Bouwman, Arthur [2 ]
Pesser, Niels [1 ]
van Nuenen, Bart [3 ]
van Sambeek, Marc [1 ]
Houterman, Saskia [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Teijink, Joep [1 ,5 ]
Versyck, Barbara [2 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Catharina Hosp, Dept Neurol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Educ & Res, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Epidemiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE; PARAVERTEBRAL BLOCK; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; PECS BLOCK; SURGERY; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2019.12.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing transaxillary thoracic outlet decompression (TATOD) is challenging because of the invasive surgery, the complex innervation of the axillary region, and the preoperative use of opioids by many patients. Commonly, postoperative pain is managed with additional opioids that introduce well-known sideeffects. To investigate the analgesic efficacy of 2 novel regional anesthesia techniques, we performed a retrospective study comparing the combined pectoral block type 1 and erector spinae block (PECS 1 + ESB) and the pectoral block type 2 (PECS 2) and systemic intravenous opioids regimen (no block) in patients undergoing TATOD. Materials and methods: We performed 10 PECS 1 + ESB and 10 PECS 2 blocks in patients undergoing TATOD. Twenty patients were randomly selected as controls. The primary endpoint was pain. Secondary endpoints were opioid use, nausea, and vomiting. Results: Postoperative maximal numeric rating scale scores on recovery were significantly lower in patients receiving either a PECS 1 + ESB or a PECS 2 block compared with controls without block (no block: median 6.00, interquartile range [IQR] 3.00; PECS 1 + ESB: median 4.50, IQR 4.00; PECS 2: median 4.00, IQR 5.00; P = 0.031). Postoperative intravenous morphine consumption was 43% lower in the PECS 1 + ESB group and 56% lower in the PECS 2 group compared with the group with no block (oral morphine equivalents; no block: mean 16.05 +/- SD 6.79 mg; PECS 1 + ESB mean 9.05 +/- SD 6.24 mg; PECS 2: mean 7.00 +/- SD 6.16; P = 0.03 and P = 0.003, respectively). There was no statistical difference in both nausea and vomitus (no block 45% nausea and 30% vomitus, PECS 1 + ESB 40% nausea and 20% vomitus, PECS 2 10% nausea and 0% vomitus, P = 0.17 and P = 0.14, respectively). Conclusions: There was a significant reduction in postoperative pain and opioid consumption for patients treated with either the PECS 1 + ESB block or PECS 2.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Ann Freischlag J. A., 2018, T AM CLIN CLIMATOL A, V129, P88
  • [2] Analgesic efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral and epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baidya, Dalim Kumar
    Khanna, Puneet
    Maitra, Souvik
    [J]. INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 18 (05) : 626 - 635
  • [3] Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): A novel approach to breast surgery
    Blanco, R.
    Fajardo, M.
    Parras Maldonado, T.
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2012, 59 (09): : 470 - 475
  • [4] The 'pecs block': a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery
    Blanco, R.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (09) : 847 - 848
  • [5] Supraclavicular decompression for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in adolescent and adult populations
    Caputo, Francis J.
    Wittenberg, Anna M.
    Vemuri, Chandu
    Driskill, Matthew R.
    Earley, Jeanne A.
    Rastogi, Rahul
    Emery, Valerie B.
    Thompson, Robert W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [6] An Evidence-Based Review of the Efficacy of Perioperative Analgesic Techniques for Breast Cancer-Related Surgery
    Cheng, Gloria S.
    Ilfeld, Brian M.
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (07) : 1344 - 1365
  • [7] The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery A Report of 3 Cases
    Chin, Ki Jinn
    Malhas, Laith
    Perlas, Anahi
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 42 (03) : 372 - 376
  • [8] Opioid prescription levels and postoperative outcomes in orthopedic surgery
    Cozowicz, Crispiana
    Olson, Ashley
    Poeran, Jashvant
    Morwald, Eva E.
    Zubizarreta, Nicole
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Mazumdar, Madhu
    Memtsoudis, Stavros G.
    [J]. PAIN, 2017, 158 (12) : 2422 - 2430
  • [9] Erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia for post-operative analgesia following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A case study and a literature review on the spread of local anaesthetic in the erector spinae plane
    Das Adhikary, Sanjib
    Pruett, Ashlee
    Forero, Mauricio
    Thiruvenkatarajan, Venkatesan
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (01) : 75 - 78
  • [10] A French Nationwide Survey on Anesthesiologist-Perceived Barriers to the Use of Epidural and Paravertebral Block in Thoracic Surgery
    Duale, Christian
    Gayraud, Guillaume
    Taheri, Hammou
    Bastien, Olivier
    Schoeffler, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (04) : 942 - 949