Incorporating Patients' Preferences Into Medical Decision Making

被引:31
作者
Fraenkel, Liana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
conjoint analysis; best worst scaling; point-of-care clinical decision support; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROSTATE-CANCER; HEALTH STATES; HEPATITIS-C; CARE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1177/1077558712461283
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Current models of care emphasize the importance of including patients' values in the decision-making process. This is particularly important for decisions for which there are few data supporting a clear strategy or treatment choice. Constructing preferences for complex decisions requires that patients be able to consider multiple trade-offs between specific risks and benefits. Several marketing research techniques have been recently applied to heath care settings to facilitate this process. Most can be programmed to generate patients' preferences or priorities, which can then be used to improve patient-physician communication. In this article, we will describe some of the currently available approaches that have been successfully used in the health care setting. We provide case examples to illustrate the potential value of adopting each of these approaches in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:80S / 93S
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], HLTH EC STUD GROUP M
  • [2] Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states
    Badia, X
    Roset, M
    Herdman, M
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (07) : 943 - 950
  • [3] Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?A discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project
    Peter Burge
    Nancy Devlin
    John Appleby
    Charlene Rohr
    Jonathan Grant
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2004, 3 (4) : 183 - 194
  • [4] Women's experiences of, and preferences for, services after rape in South Africa: interview study
    Christofides, NJ
    Muirhead, D
    Jewkes, RK
    Penn-Kekana, L
    Conco, DN
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7535): : 209 - 212A
  • [5] A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble
    Cook, KF
    Ashton, CM
    Byrne, MM
    Brody, B
    Geraci, J
    Giesler, RB
    Hanita, M
    Souchek, J
    Wray, NP
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 53 (10) : 1275 - 1285
  • [6] Cotler SJ, 2001, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V96, P2730, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04132.x
  • [7] Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment
    Darba, J.
    Restovic, G.
    Kaskens, L.
    Balbona, M. A.
    Carbonell, A.
    Cavero, P.
    Jordana, M.
    Prieto, C.
    Molina, A.
    Padro, I.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (06) : 1947 - 1954
  • [8] DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC CONCERN - THE CASE OF FOOD SAFETY
    FINN, A
    LOUVIERE, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 1992, 11 (02) : 12 - 25
  • [9] Fraenkel L, 2007, J RHEUMATOL, V34, P1894
  • [10] Decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Peters, Ellen
    Charpentier, Peter
    Olsen, Blair
    Errante, Lanette
    Schoen, Robert T.
    Reyna, Valerie
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (07) : 977 - 985