The updated Joanna Briggs Institute Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare

被引:237
作者
Jordan, Zoe [1 ]
Lockwood, Craig [1 ]
Munn, Zachary [1 ]
Aromataris, Edoardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Joanna Briggs Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
conceptual model; evidence-based healthcare; knowledge translation; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; GUIDANCE; QUALITY; POINT;
D O I
10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Joanna Briggs Institute Model for Evidence-Based Healthcare was first conceptualized in 2005. This developmental framework for evidence-based practice situated healthcare evidence, in its broadest sense, and its role and use within complex healthcare settings. The Model was recently reviewed with a view to understanding its utility by health professionals, researchers and policy makers, and the analysis revealed a need to reconsider the composition and language of the Model to ensure its currency on the international stage. Main body: The current article proposes a revised Joanna Briggs Institute Model for consideration by the international community. It seeks to clarify the conceptual integration of evidence generation, synthesis, transfer and implementation, linking how these occur with the necessarily challenging dynamics that contribute to whether translation of evidence into policy and practice is successful. It also accounts for the role of different types of evidence, both research and text and opinion, and how evidence contributes to achieving improved health outcomes globally. In addition, it is centered on the importance of accounting for evidence of feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness. Conclusion: The Model has been an important part of the Institute's development, both from a scientific and organizational perspective. Given the changing international discourse relating to evidence and its translation into policy and practice over the course of the last decade, it was opportune to revisit the Model and assess its ongoing applicability in its current form. Some alterations have been made for consideration in the hope that the Model reflects the Institute's current conceptualization of evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) and to increase its relevance and use pragmatically.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 71
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis
    Alvesson, M
    Karreman, D
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2000, 53 (09) : 1125 - 1149
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, INT COLLABORATION TR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
  • [4] Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Fernandez, Ritin
    Godfrey, Christina M.
    Holly, Cheryl
    Khalil, Hanan
    Tungpunkom, Patraporn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 132 - 140
  • [5] What is global health?
    Beaglehole, Robert
    Bonita, Ruth
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2010, 3
  • [6] Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Means Evidence-Informed, Not Evidence-Driven
    Bohart, Arthur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2005, 35 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [7] Rethinking the 'global' in global health: a dialectic approach
    Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2010, 6
  • [8] Evidence-Based Practice Point-of-Care Resources: A Quantitative Evaluation of Quality, Rigor, and Content
    Campbell, Jared M.
    Umapathysivam, Kandiah
    Xue, Yifan
    Lockwood, Craig
    [J]. WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2015, 12 (06) : 313 - 327
  • [9] Casttiglionie AS, 2017, MOVING ACTION WE KNO, P98
  • [10] Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations
    Gomersall, Judith Streak
    Jadotte, Yuri Tertilus
    Xue, Yifan
    Lockwood, Suzi
    Riddle, Dru
    Preda, Alin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 170 - 178