An algorithm to evaluate quantified Boolean formulae and its experimental evaluation

被引:61
作者
Cadoli, M [1 ]
Schaerf, M [1 ]
Giovanardi, A [1 ]
Giovanardi, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento Informat & Sistemist, I-00198 Rome, Italy
关键词
quantified Boolean formulas; SAT algorithms;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015019416843
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The high computational complexity of advanced reasoning tasks such as reasoning about knowledge and planning calls for efficient and reliable algorithms for reasoning problems harder than NP. In this paper we propose Evaluate, an algorithm for evaluating quantified Boolean formulae (QBFs). Algorithms for evaluation of QBFs are suitable for experimental analysis of problems that belong to a wide range of complexity classes, a property not easily found in other formalisms. Evaluate is a generalization of the Davis-Putnam procedure for SAT and is guaranteed to work in polynomial space. Before presenting the algorithm, we discuss several abstract properties of QBFs that we singled out to make it more efficient. We also discuss various options that were investigated about heuristics and data structures and report the main results of the experimental analysis. In particular, Evaluate is orders of magnitude more efficient than a nested backtracking procedure that resorts to a Davis-Putnam algorithm for handling the innermost set of quantifiers. Moreover, experiments show that randomly generated QBFs exhibit regular patterns such as phase transition and easy-hard-easy distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 142
页数:42
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   LINEAR-TIME ALGORITHM FOR TESTING THE TRUTH OF CERTAIN QUANTIFIED BOOLEAN FORMULAS [J].
ASPVALL, B ;
PLASS, MF ;
TARJAN, RE .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1979, 8 (03) :121-123
[2]   RESOLUTION FOR QUANTIFIED BOOLEAN-FORMULAS [J].
BUNING, HK ;
KARPINSKI, M ;
FLOGEL, A .
INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 1995, 117 (01) :12-18
[3]  
BURO M, 1993, EATCS B, V49, P143
[4]   A SURVEY OF COMPLEXITY RESULTS FOR NONMONOTONIC LOGICS [J].
CADOLI, M ;
SCHAERF, M .
JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 1993, 17 (2-4) :127-160
[5]  
Cadoli M., 1997, AI*IA 97: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. 5th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings, P207
[6]  
Cadoli M, 1998, FIFTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-98) AND TENTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE (IAAI-98) - PROCEEDINGS, P262
[7]   Experimental results on the crossover point in random 3-SAT [J].
Crawford, JM ;
Auton, LD .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 81 (1-2) :31-57
[8]  
CRAWFORD JM, 1993, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P21
[9]   ON THE COMPLEXITY OF PROPOSITIONAL KNOWLEDGE BASE REVISION, UPDATES, AND COUNTERFACTUALS [J].
EITER, T ;
GOTTLOB, G .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 57 (2-3) :227-270
[10]   THE COMPLEXITY OF LOGIC-BASED ABDUCTION [J].
EITER, T ;
GOTTLOB, G .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1995, 42 (01) :3-42