Transcaval access for the emergency delivery of 5.0 liters per minute mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

被引:18
作者
Afana, Majed [1 ]
Altawil, Mahmoud [1 ]
Basir, Mir [1 ]
Alqarqaz, Mohammad [1 ]
Alaswad, Khaldoon [1 ]
Eng, Marvin [1 ,2 ]
O'Neill, William W. [1 ,2 ]
Lederman, Robert J. [3 ]
Greenbaum, Adam B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Div Cardiol, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Ctr Struct Heart Dis, Detroit, MI USA
[3] NHLBI, Cardiovasc Branch, Div Intramural Res, NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Struct Heart & Valve Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
cardiogenic shock; mechanical circulatory support; transcaval; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON COUNTERPULSATION; METAANALYSIS; DEVICE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.29235
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The purpose of this study was to describe the feasibility and early outcomes of transcaval access for delivery of emergency mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock. Background Vascular access for implantation of MCS in patients with cardiogenic shock is often challenging due to peripheral arterial disease and vasoconstriction. Transcaval delivery of MCS may be an alternative. We describe a series of patients we implanted an Impella 5.0 device, on-table without CT planning, through a percutaneous transcaval access route. Methods Ten patients with progressive or refractory cardiogenic shock underwent Impella 5.0 implantation via transcaval access. Demographic, clinical and procedural variables and in-hospital outcomes were collected. Results All ten underwent emergency implantation of the 7 mm diameter Impella 5.0 device via transcaval access. Six were women, with median age of 55.5 years (range, 29-69). Cardiogenic shock was attributed to idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n= 4), myocarditis (n= 2), ischemic cardiomyopathy (n= 2), heart transplant rejection (n= 1), and unknown etiology (n= 1). Median duration of support was 92.1 hr (range, 21.2-165.4). Seven (70%) survived to device explant, with six (60%) surviving to access port closure and discharge. Among survivors, five recovered heart function and one received destination therapy left ventricular assist device. Conclusions Transcaval access is feasible for emergency nonsurgical implantation of the Impella 5.0 device in cardiogenic shock with small or diseased iliofemoral arteries. This allows early institution of higher-flow MCS than conventional femoral artery implantation of the 3.5 L Impella CP device, and enables a bridge-to-recovery or bridge-to-destination strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 564
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Incidence and prognosis of vascular complications after percutaneous placement of left ventricular assist device [J].
Abaunza, Miriam ;
Kabbani, Loay S. ;
Nypaver, Timothy ;
Greenbaum, Adam ;
Balraj, Praveen ;
Qureshi, Sherazuddin ;
Alqarqaz, Mohammed A. ;
Shepard, Alexander D. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (02) :417-423
[2]   Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials [J].
Cheng, Jin M. ;
den Uil, Corstiaan A. ;
Hoeks, Sanne E. ;
van der Ent, Martin ;
Jewbali, Lucia S. D. ;
van Domburg, Ron T. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (17) :2102-2108
[3]   Caval-Aortic Access to Allow Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Otherwise Ineligible Patients [J].
Greenbaum, Adam B. ;
O'Neill, William W. ;
Paone, Gaetano ;
Guerrero, Mayra E. ;
Wyman, Janet F. ;
Cooper, R. Lebron ;
Lederman, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (25) :2795-2804
[4]  
Kamioka N, 2017, CATHETER CARDIOVASC, V93, pE343
[5]   Anatomic Suitability for Transcaval Access Based on Computed Tomography [J].
Lederman, Robert J. ;
Greenbaum, Adam B. ;
Rogers, Toby ;
Khan, Jaffar M. ;
Fusari, Melissa ;
Chen, Marcus Y. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (01) :1-10
[6]   How to perform transcaval access and closure for transcatheter aortic valve implantation [J].
Lederman, Robert J. ;
Babaliaros, Vasilis C. ;
Greenbaum, Adam B. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 86 (07) :1242-1254
[7]   Effectiveness and Safety of the Impella 5.0 as a Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation or Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device [J].
Lima, Brian ;
Kale, Parag ;
Gonzalez-Stawinski, Gonzalo V. ;
Kuiper, Johannes J. ;
Carey, Sandra ;
Hall, Shelley A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 117 (10) :1622-1628
[8]   Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitie-Salpetriere [J].
Mastroianni, Ciro ;
Bouabdallaoui, Nadia ;
Leprince, Pascal ;
Lebreton, Guillaume .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2017, 6 (01) :87-92
[9]   Health Outcomes with and without Use of Inotropic Therapy in Cardiac Surgery Results of a Propensity Score-matched Analysis [J].
Nielsen, Dorthe Viemose ;
Hansen, Malene Kaerslund ;
Johnsen, Soren Paaske ;
Hansen, Mads ;
Hindsholm, Karsten ;
Jakobsen, Carl-Johan .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 120 (05) :1098-1108
[10]   2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure [J].
Ponikowski, Piotr ;
Voors, Adriaan A. ;
Anker, Stefan D. ;
Bueno, Hector ;
Cleland, John G. F. ;
Coats, Andrew J. S. ;
Falk, Volkmar ;
Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey, Jose ;
Harjola, Veli-Pekka ;
Jankowska, Ewa A. ;
Jessup, Mariell ;
Linde, Cecilia ;
Nihoyannopoulos, Petros ;
Parissis, John T. ;
Pieske, Burkert ;
Riley, Jillian P. ;
Rosano, Giuseppe M. C. ;
Ruilope, Luis M. ;
Ruschitzka, Frank ;
Rutten, Frans H. ;
van der Meer, Peter .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (27) :2129-U130