Sampling Strategies for Tissue Microarrays to Evaluate Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer

被引:11
|
作者
Permuth-Wey, Jenny
Boulware, David
Valkov, Nikola
Livingston, Sandra
Nicosia, Santo
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Sutphen, Rebecca
Schildkraut, Joellen [2 ]
Narod, Steven [3 ]
Parker, Alex [4 ]
Coppola, Domenico
Sellers, Thomas
Pal, Tuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Epidemiol & Genet, MRC CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[3] Womens Coll Hosp, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[4] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL-CANCER; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; MISMATCH-REPAIR; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; BREAST-CANCER; RISK; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; VALIDATION; CARCINOMA; HMLH1;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0713
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Tissue microarrays (TMA) enable rapid analysis of biomarkers in large-scale studies involving archival tumor specimens, however, their utility in heterogeneous tumors such as ovarian cancer is limited. Methods: In this study, immunohistochemical analysis was done on TMAs comprised of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) to estimate the prevalence of loss of expression of three mismatch repair proteins. TMAs were initially created using cores sampled from the center of donor tissue blocks from 59 EOC cases. Full sections were subsequently created and levels of expression were compared between tissues sampled from the central portion versus the periphery. Followup analyses were done by obtaining cores from the periphery of up to five additional donor blocks per case. A linear mixed model for each protein was used to investigate differences between results from the initial and follow-up blocks. Results: In the original TMAs created using centrally sampled cores, loss of mismatch repair expression was noted in 17 (29%) of the 59 cases. By comparison, analyses from peripherally sampled cores revealed loss of expression in only 6 of these 17 cases. For each protein, significant differences (P < 0.05) were detected between results from the initial donor block and the majority of the follow-up blocks. Conclusions: Our investigations, based on EOC, suggest that sampling variability in protein expression may result when TMAs are used. Thus, at least for EOC, it is important to preferentially sample from the periphery of tumor blocks where exposure to tissue fixatives is optimal. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(1):28-34)
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 34
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Discovering cancer biomarkers from clinical samples by protein microarrays
    Hu, Bin
    Niu, Xin
    Cheng, Li
    Yang, Li-Na
    Li, Qing
    Wang, Yang
    Tao, Sheng-Ce
    Zhou, Shu-Min
    PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 9 (1-2) : 98 - 110
  • [22] Biomarkers for Systemic Therapy in Ovarian Cancer
    Penzvalto, Zsofia
    Surowiak, Pawel
    Gyorffy, Balazs
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2014, 14 (03) : 259 - 273
  • [23] Ovarian Cancer: Biomarkers and Targeted Therapy
    Radu, Mihaela Raluca
    Pradatu, Alina
    Duica, Florentina
    Micu, Romeo
    Cretoiu, Sanda Maria
    Suciu, Nicolae
    Cretoiu, Dragos
    Varlas, Valentin Nicolae
    Radoi, Viorica Elena
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [24] Ovarian cancer extracellular vesicle biomarkers
    Jamali, Zeinab
    Razipour, Masoumeh
    Zargar, Mahsa
    Ghasemnejad-Berenji, Hojat
    Akrami, Seyed Mohammad
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2025, 565
  • [25] Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
    Yip, Ping
    Chen, Tzong-Hao
    Seshaiah, Partha
    Stephen, Laurie L.
    Michael-Ballard, Karri L.
    Mapes, James P.
    Mansfield, Brian C.
    Bertenshaw, Greg P.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (12):
  • [26] Phenotypic characterization of hereditary epithelial ovarian cancer based on a tissue microarray study
    Munoz-Repeto, Ivan
    Jose Garcia, Maria
    Kamieniak, Marta
    Ramon y Cajal, Teresa
    Domingo, Samuel
    Cazorla, Alicia
    Garcia Donas, Jesus
    Hernando Polo, Susana
    Garcia Sagredo, Jose Miguel
    Hernandez, Elena
    Lacambra, Carmen
    Saez, Raquel
    Robles, Luis
    Borrego, Salud
    Prat, Jaime
    Palacios, Jose
    Benitez, Javier
    HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (01) : 133 - 144
  • [27] Quantitative analysis of breast cancer tissue microarrays shows high Cox-2 expression is associated with poor outcome
    Zerkowski, Maciej P.
    Camp, Robert L.
    Burtness, Barbara A.
    Rimm, David L.
    Chung, Gina G.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2007, 25 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [28] Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer
    Besusparis, Justinas
    Plancoulaine, Benoit
    Rasmusson, Allan
    Augulis, Renaldas
    Green, Andrew R.
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Laurinaviciene, Aida
    Herlin, Paulette
    Laurinavicius, Arvydas
    DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [29] Cancer and ovarian tissue cryopreservation
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Ozmen, Batuhan
    Sonmezer, Murat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 40 (02) : 159 - 168
  • [30] Breast cancer and ovarian tissue cryopreservation: Review of the literature
    Fleury, Audrey
    Pirrello, Olivier
    Maugard, Christine
    Mathelin, Carole
    Linck, Christelle
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 47 (08) : 351 - 357