Randomized clinical trial of the efficacy, tolerability, and long-term color stability of two bleaching techniques: 18-month follow-up

被引:0
作者
Auschill, Thorsten M. [1 ]
Schneider-Del Savio, Thorsten
Hellwig, Elmar [2 ]
Arweiler, Nicole B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Marburg, Dept Periodontol, Dent Sch & Hosp, D-35039 Marburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dent Sch & Hosp, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Philipps Univ & Hosp, Dept Periodontol, Marburg, Germany
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2012年 / 43卷 / 08期
关键词
follow-up; hydrogen peroxide; long-term stability; randomized clinical trial; shade relapse; tooth bleaching; IN-OFFICE; AT-HOME; TOOTH; MICROHARDNESS; PEROXIDE; ENAMEL; PRODUCTS; TEETH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and long-term color stability of tooth whitening using two different bleaching techniques: an at-home tray technique (5.0% H2O2) and an over-the counter strip technique (5.3% H2O2). Method and Materials: Thirty subjects were included in this two-cell, parallel, examiner-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Shade evaluations were performed with a value-oriented VITA shade guide. The null hypothesis was that there would be not differences between the groups and no improvements from baseline with regard to tooth shade. Bleaching sensitivity, gingival irritation, and patient acceptance were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to detect any enamel surface changes. Results: After bleaching, both treatments demonstrated significant improvements in tooth shade (P < .001 for both groups). At the 18-month recall, tooth shade remained significantly lighter than at baseline (P = .006 for tray group; P = .001 for strip group). However, a relapse of the tooth shade was observed compared with the immediate postbleaching result (P < .05). VAS data yielded no significant differences between groups regarding bleaching sensitivity and gingival irritation. None of the teeth studied showed detectable enamel surface changes. Patient acceptance was statistically significantly higher in the tray group compared with the strip group (P < .05). Conclusion: Both techniques demonstrated significant and comparable levels of tooth shade improvement after 2 weeks and 18 months. Each treatment caused similar, transient oral adverse effects. (Quintessence Int 2012;43:683-694)
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 694
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HARM TRIP GUID GOOD
[2]  
Auschill Thorsten M, 2002, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, V112, P894
[3]  
Auschill Thorsten M, 2007, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, V117, P843
[4]  
Auschill TM, 2005, OPER DENT, V30, P156
[5]  
Bitter N C, 1993, Quintessence Int, V24, P817
[6]  
Burrows Stephen, 2009, Dent Update, V36, P537
[7]  
Cohen S C, 1979, J Endod, V5, P134, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80033-3
[8]   Prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy: A review of the literature [J].
Critchlow, Simon B. ;
Ellis, Janice S. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 38 (01) :2-9
[9]   Tooth bleaching - A critical review of the biological aspects [J].
Dahl, JE ;
Pallesen, U .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2003, 14 (04) :292-304
[10]  
Demarco FF, 2009, BRAZ ORAL RES, V23, P64