Calculating the benefit of conservation actions

被引:110
作者
Maron, Martine [1 ]
Rhodes, Jonathan R. [1 ]
Gibbons, Philip [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Landscape Ecol & Conservat Grp, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2013年 / 6卷 / 05期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Additionality; agri-environment schemes; biodiversity offsets; conservation benefit; conservation decision-making; counterfactual scenario; reserve selection; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS; RESERVE SELECTION; VULNERABILITY; HABITAT; IRREPLACEABILITY; PRIORITIZATION; INVESTMENT; PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12007
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The benefit (or additionality) attributable to a conservation action is the difference between the outcomes of two scenarios: (1) the scenario with the conservation action, and (2) the alternative scenario, in which action did not occur. However, many conservation decisions are made using approaches that do not appropriately calculate this benefit. We review recent scientific literature and conservation policies to examine how conservation benefit is calculated in three situations: systematic reserve selection, investment in agri-environment schemes, and biodiversity offset trades. In the examples we considered, the approaches used to calculate conservation benefit often involved assumptions about the alternative scenario that were not explicit, demonstrably wrong or both. We suggest that assumptions about how conservation value changes over time in the alternative scenario can often be substantially refined, and that making these assumptions explicit by calculating directly the expected difference between the two scenarios is likely to improve the quality of conservation decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 367
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], VICT NAT VEG MAN FRA
[2]  
Bauer Marybeth., 2004, Environmental Law Review, V34, P10717
[3]   Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands [J].
Burgess, ND ;
Hales, JD ;
Ricketts, TH ;
Dinerstein, E .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 127 (04) :383-401
[4]  
Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP), 2009, BIOD OFFS DES HDB AP
[5]   Prioritizing threat management for biodiversity conservation [J].
Carwardine, Josie ;
O'Connor, Trudy ;
Legge, Sarah ;
Mackey, Brendan ;
Possingham, Hugh P. ;
Martin, Tara G. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2012, 5 (03) :196-204
[6]  
COLLINS D, 2008, MARKET BASED INSTRUM
[7]   Contribution of site assessment toward prioritising investment in natural capital [J].
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Bryan, Brett A. ;
King, Darran .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (01) :30-37
[8]  
DECC, 2008, BIOBANKING ASS METH
[9]  
Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM), 2011, EC EQ METH GUID POL
[10]  
Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), 2011, BIOD OFFS TECHN PAP