Rates and Success Rates of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in the United States, 1990-2009

被引:56
作者
Uddin, Sayeedha F. G. [1 ]
Simon, Alan E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Hlth Care Stat, Natl Ctr Hlth Stat, Hyattsville, MD 20782 USA
关键词
Trial of labor; Trial of labor success; Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery; Cesarean section; VAGINAL BIRTH; UTERINE RUPTURE; IDENTIFY INDICATIONS; SECTION; WOMEN; RISK; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-012-1132-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study compares rates of trial of labor after Cesarean delivery (TOLAC) and rates of successful TOLAC between 1990 and 2009. Serial cross-sectional analyses were performed using the National Hospital Discharge Survey data to compare rates of TOLAC and TOLAC success between 1990 and 2009. Joinpoint regression was used to assess trends over time, and logistic regression with marginal effects was used to examine the unadjusted and adjusted significance and magnitude of trends. The rate of TOLAC reached a high of 51.8 % (95 % CI 47.8-55.8 %) in 1995 and a low of 15.9 % (95 % CI 13.8-18.0 %) in 2006, declined, on average, 4.2 (95 % CI -4.8 to -3.9) percentage points per year between 1996 and 2005. Rates increased significantly from 1990 to 1996 and 2005 to 2009. TOLAC success was at its highest rate in 2000, 69.8 % (95 % CI 65.2-74.3 %) and its lowest in 2008, 38.5 % (95 % CI 28.1-48.8 %). The rate of TOLAC success increased significantly between 1990 and 2000, but declined thereafter an average of 3.4 % points per year (95 % CI -4.3 to -2.5). The rate of TOLAC in the US decreased between 1996 and 2005 and the rate of successful TOLAC has declined from 2000 to 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1314
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Consens Dev Conf Summ Natl Inst Health, V3, P39
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V64, P201
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Obstetrics and Gynecology, V116, P450, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E3181EEB251
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V48, P127
[6]   Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate [J].
Bais, JMJ ;
van der Borden, DMR ;
Pel, M ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Eskes, M ;
van der Slikke, HJW ;
Bleker, OP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 96 (02) :158-162
[7]   Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at a community hospital [J].
Blanchette, H ;
Blanchette, M ;
McCabe, J ;
Vincent, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (07) :1478-1487
[8]   Analysis of Past Secular Trends of Hip Fractures and Predicted Number in the Future 2010-2050 [J].
Brown, Christopher A. ;
Starr, Aijing Z. ;
Nunley, James A. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (02) :117-122
[9]   Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? [J].
Cahill, Alison G. ;
Stamilio, David M. ;
Odibo, Anthony O. ;
Peipert, Jeffrey F. ;
Ratcliffe, Sarah J. ;
Stevens, Erika J. ;
Sammel, Mary D. ;
Macones, George A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (04) :1143-1147
[10]   Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries [J].
Caughey, AB ;
Shipp, TD ;
Repke, JT ;
Zelop, CM ;
Cohen, A ;
Lieberman, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (04) :872-876