DIFFERENTIAL RECRUITMENT OF BRAIN NETWORKS DURING VISUOSPATIAL AND COLOR PROCESSING: EVIDENCE FROM ERP MICROSTATES

被引:12
作者
Antonova, I. [1 ,2 ]
Banninger, A. [1 ]
Dierks, T. [1 ]
Griskova-Bulanova, I. [2 ]
Koenig, T. [1 ]
Kohler, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Translat Res Ctr, Univ Hosp Psychiat, CH-3000 Bern 60, Switzerland
[2] Vilnius Univ, Dept Neurobiol & Biophys, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Univ Osnabruck, Inst Cognit Sci, D-49076 Osnabruck, Germany
关键词
microstate analysis; visuospatial judgment; EEG; ERP; parietal cortex; frontal cortex; RIGHT-HEMISPHERE DOMINANCE; SPATIAL ATTENTION; PARIETAL CORTEX; MINDS IMAGE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; FMRI; IMPAIRMENTS; POTENTIALS; ASYMMETRY; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.078
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies consistently revealed contributions of fronto-parietal and related networks to the execution of a visuospatial judgment task, the so-called "Clock Task". However, due to the low temporal resolution of fMRI, the exact cortical dynamics and timing of processing during task performance could not be resolved until now. In order to clarify the detailed cortical activity and temporal dynamics, 14 healthy subjects performed an established version of the "Clock Task", which comprises a visuospatial task (angle discrimination) and a control task (color discrimination) with the same stimulus material, in an electroencephalography (EEG) experiment. Based on the time-resolved analysis of network activations (microstate analysis), differences in timing between the angle compared to the color discrimination task were found after sensory processing in a time window starting around 200 ms. Significant differences between the two tasks were observed in an analysis window from 192 ms to 776 ms. We divided this window in two parts: an early phase - from 192 ms to similar to 440 ms, and a late phase - from similar to 440 ms to 776 ms. For both tasks, the order of network activations and the types of networks were the same, but, in each phase, activations for the two conditions were dominated by differing network states with divergent temporal dynamics. Our results provide an important basis for the assessment of deviations in processing dynamics during visuospatial tasks in clinical populations. (C) 2015 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 138
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Electrical Neuroimaging, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596889.008
[2]   Neuropsychological features of mild cognitive impairment and preclinical Alzheimer's disease [J].
Arnáiz, E ;
Almkvist, O .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 107 :34-41
[3]   Clozapine and visuospatial processing in treatment-resistant schizophrenia [J].
Bourque, Josiane ;
Lakis, Nadia ;
Champagne, Julie ;
Stip, Emmanuel ;
Lalonde, Pierre ;
Lipp, Olivier ;
Mendrek, Adrianna .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2013, 18 (06) :615-630
[4]   Spatiotemporal Analysis of Multichannel EEG: CARTOOL [J].
Brunet, Denis ;
Murray, Micah M. ;
Michel, Christoph M. .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 2011
[5]  
Bustillo JR, 1997, AM J PSYCHIAT, V154, P647
[6]   Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments [J].
Butler, Pamela D. ;
Martinez, Antigona ;
Foxe, John J. ;
Kim, Dongsoo ;
Zemon, Vance ;
Silipo, Gail ;
Mahoney, Jeannette ;
Shpaner, Marina ;
Jalbrzikowski, Maria ;
Javitt, Daniel C. .
BRAIN, 2007, 130 :417-430
[7]   Visuospatial processing in schizophrenia: Does it share common mechanisms with pseudoneglect? [J].
Cavezian, Celine ;
Michel, Carine ;
Rossetti, Yves ;
Danckert, James ;
d'Amato, Thierry ;
Saoud, Mohamed .
LATERALITY, 2011, 16 (04) :433-461
[8]   Space and attention in parietal cortex [J].
Colby, CL ;
Goldberg, ME .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 22 :319-349
[9]   Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter [J].
Corballis, PM .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2003, 53 (02) :171-176
[10]   Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex [J].
Culham, JC ;
Kanwisher, NG .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (02) :157-163