The Accuracy of the F Statistic for Structural Health Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Gunawan, Fergyanto E. [1 ]
Soewito, Benfano [2 ]
Surantha, Nico [2 ]
Mauritsius, Tuga [3 ]
Sekishita, Nobumasa [4 ]
机构
[1] Bina Nusantara Univ, Ind Engn Dept, BINUS Grad Program Master Ind Engn, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia
[2] Bina Nusantara Univ, Comp Sci Dept, BINUS Grad Program Master Comp Sci, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia
[3] Bina Nusantara Univ, Informat Syst Management Dept, BINUS Grad Program Master Informat Syst Managemen, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia
[4] Toyohashi Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Toyohashi, Aichi 4418580, Japan
关键词
TIME-SERIES METHODS; DAMAGE; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1063/5.0000937
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Understanding the reliability of engineering methods is crucial for its adoption and deployment. This research focuses on the reliability of the Power Spectral Density (PSD) method via the use of the F statistic for damage detection. To the author best knowledge, the method is rather classic but its realibility has not been discussed in the context of a large data size. Priory, the research anticipates that the accuracy is a function of the damage level. In this study, we evaluate 3500 cases with five levels of structural integrity, namely, healthy condition and damaged conditions with 1%, 5%, 10%, and 20% damage levels. The dataset is established via a numerical analysis of a seven degree-of-freedom system loaded with a concentrated dynamic force with random magnitude. A spring on the system is reduced in its stiffness to simulate damages. Our significant findings are the following: it is challenging for the PSD-based method to differentiate the healthy condition from the damaged conditions when the damage level is small. However, the reliability is high at 95% probability when the structural integrity has dropped by five percent.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preface: Structural Health Monitoring
    Chattopadhyay, Aditi
    Ghanem, Roger
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 24 (17) : 2061 - 2062
  • [22] Structural health monitoring - Preface
    Farrar, Charles R.
    Worden, Keith
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 365 (1851): : 299 - 301
  • [23] Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring and Condition Monitoring
    Pozo, Francesc
    Tibaduiza, Diego A.
    Vidal, Yolanda
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (05) : 1 - 6
  • [24] Practicalities of structural health monitoring
    Shrive, P. L.
    Brown, T. G.
    Shrive, N. G.
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 5 (04) : 357 - 367
  • [25] Aircraft structural health monitoring
    O'Brien, EW
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING AND INTELLIGENT INFRASTRUCTURE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1353 - 1355
  • [26] IoT for Structural Health Monitoring
    Scuro, Carmelo
    Sciammarella, Paolo Francesco
    Lamonaca, Francesco
    Olivito, Renato Sante
    Carni, Domenico Luca
    IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT MAGAZINE, 2018, 21 (06) : 4 - +
  • [27] On the value of structural health monitoring
    Faber, M. H.
    Thoens, S.
    SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: BEYOND THE HORIZON, 2014, : 2535 - 2544
  • [28] Structural Control Health Monitoring
    Faravelli, Lucia
    Nagarajaiah, Satish
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2017, 24 (11):
  • [29] Integrated structural health monitoring
    Farrar, CR
    Sohn, H
    Fugate, ML
    Czarnecki, JJ
    ADVANCED NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION FOR STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL HEALTH MONITORING, 2001, 4335 : 1 - 8
  • [30] A novel health probability for structural health monitoring
    Zhao, Xueyan
    Lang, Ziqiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING (ICAC 12), 2012, : 90 - 95