The use of multi-criteria analysis for selection of technology for a household WWTP compatible with sustainable development

被引:50
|
作者
Jozwiakowski, Krzysztof [1 ]
Mucha, Zbigniew [2 ]
Generowicz, Agnieszka [2 ]
Baran, Stanislaw [3 ]
Bielinska, Jolanta [3 ]
Wojcik, Wlodzimierz [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Life Sci, Fac Prod Engn, Dept Environm Engn & Geodesy, Lublin, Poland
[2] Cracow Univ Technol, Fac Environm Engn, Inst Water Supply & Environm Protect, Krakow, Poland
[3] Univ Life Sci, Fac Agrobioengn, Inst Soil Sci Engn & Environm Engn, Lublin, Poland
[4] Krosno State Coll, Dept Civil Engn, Krosno, Poland
关键词
household wastewater treatment plants; multi-criteria analysis; sustainable development; rural areas; AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES; WASTE; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1515/aep-2015-0033
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents the use of multi-criteria analysis as a tool that helps choosing an adequate technology for a household wastewater treatment plant. In the process of selection the criteria of sustainable development were taken into account. Five municipal mechanical-biological treatment plants were chosen for the comparative multi-criteria analysis. Different treatment technologies, such as sand filter, activated sludge, trickling filter, a hybrid system -activated sludge/trickling filter and a hybrid constructed wetland system VF-HF type (vertical and horizontal flow) were taken into account. The plants' capacities were 1 m(3).d(-1) (PE=8) and they all meet the environmental regulations. Additionally, a solution with a drainage system was included into the analysis. On the basis of multi-criteria analysis it was found that the preferred wastewater treatment technologies, consistent with the principles of sustainable development, were a sand filter and a hybrid constructed wetland type VF-HF. A drainage system was chosen as the best solution due to the economic criteria, however, taking into consideration the primary (ecological) criterion, employment of such systems on a larger scale disagree with the principles of sustainable development. It was found that activated sludge is the least favourable technology. The analysis showed that this technology is not compatible with the principles of sustainable development, due to a lack of proper technological stability and low reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 82
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection of the optimal technology for surface mining by multi-criteria analysis
    Stojanovic, Cvjetko
    Bogdanovic, Dejan
    Urosevic, Snezana
    KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2015, 42 (03) : 170 - 190
  • [2] A stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable biomass crop selection
    Cobuloglu, Halil I.
    Bueyuektahtakin, I. Esra
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (15-16) : 6065 - 6074
  • [3] Multi-criteria analysis of deep pits sustainable development strategy
    Burmistrov, K. V.
    Osintsev, N. A.
    Rakhmangulov, A. N.
    Yusupov, M. E.
    BULLETIN OF THE TOMSK POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY-GEO ASSETS ENGINEERING, 2023, 334 (12): : 76 - 96
  • [4] Multi-criteria Analysis for Sustainable Buildings
    De Angelis, A.
    Cheche, N.
    De Masi, R. F.
    Pecce, M. R.
    Vanoli, G. P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ITALIAN CONCRETE DAYS 2016, 2018, 10 : 3 - 16
  • [5] Selection of Sustainable Development Strategy using a New Multi-Criteria Approach TOPSISIC
    Moalla, Khouloud
    Dhouib, Diala
    2019 INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (LOGISTIQUA), 2019,
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Selection of Alternatives for Sustainable Urban Transportation
    Feyzioglu, O.
    Ersoy, M. S.
    Buyukozkan, G.
    IEEM: 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 395 - +
  • [7] A multi-criteria multi-period approach for energy project selection in sustainable development context
    Frini, Anissa
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN ENERGY, 2014, : 65 - 71
  • [8] Methods of multi-criteria analysis in technology selection and technology assessment: a systematic literature review
    Kozłowska J.
    Engineering Management in Production and Services, 2022, 14 (02) : 116 - 137
  • [9] Development of multi-criteria decision making model for remanufacturing technology portfolio selection
    Jiang, Zhigang
    Zhang, Hua
    Sutherland, John W.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (17-18) : 1939 - 1945
  • [10] Selection of Facades Finishing Technology for a Commercial Building Using Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Lesniak, Agnieszka
    Balicki, Jakub
    ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2016, 4 (02) : 67 - 79