A stoma quality of life scale

被引:85
作者
Baxter, NN
Novotny, PJ
Jacobson, T
Maidl, LJ
Sloan, J
Young-Fadok, TM
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Canc Ctr Stat, Dept Biostat, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
quality of life; colostomy; ileostomy; stoma; SF-12;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-005-0275-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Few studies have evaluated the impact of a stoma on patient quality of life because of a lack of specific validated measures. This study documents the development and initial application of a Stoma Quality of Life Scale. METHODS: Content experts generated initial questions. Patient focus groups were conducted to ensure that the questions addressed all stoma- related issues considered important by patients. Responses from pilot groups allowed refinement to produce the final measure, the Stoma Quality of Life Scale, a 21- item questionnaire. Three scales are featured: Work/ Social Function (6 items), Sexuality/Body Image (5 items), and Stoma Function (6 items). In addition, one item (scored separately) measures financial impact, one measures skin irritation, and two measure overall satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered to 100 consecutive ostomy patients, and readministered three weeks later. Reliability was assessed by using coefficient alpha for internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficient for test- retest reproducibility. To test validity in extreme groups, scores were compared for patients with improved quality of life vs. those whose stoma worsened their quality of life. To evaluate convergent validity, we analyzed correlation of instrument scales with the SF-12. RESULTS: The Stoma Quality of Life scales demonstrated adequate test- retest reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.8) and acceptable internal consistency (coefficient alpha approximately 0.8). The scales were capable of discriminating between patients with better and worse quality of life after stoma formation (P < 0.02 for all scales). The Stoma Quality of Life scales significantly correlated (range, 0.12 - 0.75) with the Physical and Mental Health Composite Scale Scores of the SF-12. CONCLUSIONS: The Stoma Quality of Life Scale demonstrates reasonable psychometric properties for measuring quality of life in patients with stomas. Further studies are needed to refine the instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 212
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Survival and psychosocial adjustment to stoma surgery and nonstoma bowel resection: A 4-year follow-up [J].
Bekkers, MJTM ;
vanKnippenberg, FCE ;
vanDulmen, AM ;
vandenBorne, HW ;
vanBergeHenegouwen, GP .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1997, 42 (03) :235-244
[2]   PSYCHOSOCIAL ADAPTATION TO STOMA SURGERY - A REVIEW [J].
BEKKERS, MJTM ;
VANKNIPPENBERG, FCE ;
VANDENBORNE, HW ;
POEN, H ;
BERGSMA, J ;
VANBERGEHENEGOUWEN, GP .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1995, 18 (01) :1-31
[3]   INDEXES AND BOUNDARIES FOR QUANTITATIVE SIGNIFICANCE IN STATISTICAL DECISIONS [J].
BURNAND, B ;
KERNAN, WN ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (12) :1273-1284
[4]  
Camilleri-Brennan J, 2002, Colorectal Dis, V4, P167, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00352.x
[5]  
Camilleri-Brennan J, 2001, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V83, P321
[6]  
CAMILLERIBRENNA.J, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V7, P814
[7]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[8]   PSYCHOSOCIAL ADJUSTMENT FOLLOWING OSTOMY [J].
FOLLICK, MJ ;
SMITH, TW ;
TURK, DC .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 3 (06) :505-517
[9]   ELDERLY ILEOSTOMISTS AND THEIR SOCIAL-PROBLEMS [J].
FOULIS, W ;
MAYBERRY, JF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 12 (03) :276-278
[10]   Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: Results of a retrospective interdisciplinary study [J].
Gerharz, EW ;
Weingartner, K ;
Dopatka, T ;
Kohl, UN ;
Basler, HD ;
Riedmiller, HN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (03) :778-785