The Cognitive Philosophy of Reflection

被引:1
作者
Stephens, Andreas [1 ]
Tjostheim, Trond A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Box 192, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES; WORKING-MEMORY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; EPISODIC BUFFER; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INFEROTEMPORAL CORTEX; PROCESS MODELS; NEUROSCIENCE; HEURISTICS; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10670-020-00299-0
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Hilary Kornblith argues that many traditional philosophical accounts involve problematic views of reflection (understood as second-order mental states). According to Kornblith, reflection does not add reliability, which makes it unfit to underlie a separate form of knowledge. We show that a broader understanding of reflection, encompassing Type 2 processes, working memory, and episodic long-term memory, can provide philosophy with elucidating input that a restricted view misses. We further argue that reflection in fact often does add reliability, through generalizability, flexibility, and creativity that is helpful in newly encountered situations, even if the restricted sense of both reflection and knowledge is accepted. And so, a division of knowledge into one reflexive (animal) form and one reflective form remains a plausible, and possibly fruitful, option.
引用
收藏
页码:2219 / 2242
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thinking dispositions and cognitive reflection performance in schizotypy
    Broyd, Annabel
    Ettinger, Ulrich
    Thoma, Volker
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 14 (01): : 80 - 90
  • [32] How cognitive theory guides neuroscience
    Frank, Michael J.
    Badre, David
    COGNITION, 2015, 135 : 14 - 20
  • [33] Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test
    Thomson, Keela S.
    Oppenheimer, Daniel M.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 11 (01): : 99 - 113
  • [34] The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test
    Travers, Eoin
    Rolison, Jonathan J.
    Feeney, Aidan
    COGNITION, 2016, 150 : 109 - 118
  • [35] Cognitive Reflection, Decision Biases, and Response Times
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    Garagnani, Michele
    Huegelschaefer, Sabine
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [36] Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when
    Branas-Garza, Pablo
    Kujal, Praveen
    Lenkei, Balint
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 82
  • [37] Feedback from moral philosophy to cognitive science
    Rini, Regina A.
    PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 28 (04) : 569 - 588
  • [38] Multiple numeric competencies predict decision outcomes beyond fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection
    Sobkow, Agata
    Olszewska, Angelika
    Traczyk, Jakub
    INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 80
  • [39] One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test
    Erceg, Nikola
    Bubic, Andreja
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 381 - 392
  • [40] Evaluating the Cognitive Reflection Test as a Measure of Intuition/Reflection, Numeracy, and Insight Problem Solving, and the Implications for Understanding Real-World Judgments and Beliefs
    Patel, Niraj
    Baker, S. Glenn
    Scherer, Laura D.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2019, 148 (12) : 2129 - 2153