Treatment appraisals and beliefs predict adherence to complementary therapies: A prospective study using a dynamic extended self-regulation model

被引:29
作者
Bishop, Felicity L. [1 ]
Yardley, Lucy [2 ]
Lewith, George T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Complementary Med Res Unit, Southampton SO16 5ST, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Sch Psychol, Southampton SO16 5ST, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.1348/135910707X249570
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is used by large numbers of the general public and is increasingly becoming integrated into the mainstream. An understanding of why people use CAM in general has been developed in the literature, but relatively little is known specifically about adherence to CAM. We tested hypotheses (derived from a dynamic extended version of Leventhal's common-sense model) that patients' beliefs about treatment, perceptions of illness, and treatment appraisals would predict adherence to CAM. Design. A prospective self-report questionnaire study was carried out with a 3-month follow-up period. Methods. A total of 240 patients from five CAM clinics completed self-report questionnaire measures of treatment beliefs, illness perceptions, and treatment appraisals at baseline. Three months later, they completed self-report measures of adherence to therapists' recommendations concerning attendance, remedy use, and life-style changes. Results. Logistic regression analyses showed that positive perceptions of one's therapist and belief that mental factors do not cause illness independently predicted adherence to appointments. Positive beliefs in holistic health and finding it difficult to travel to appointments predicted adherence to remedy use. Using homeopathy was the only independent predictor of adherence to life-style changes. Conclusions. Treatment appraisals, treatment beliefs, and illness perceptions explain modest proportions of the variance in adherence to CAM. This study highlights the value of operationalizing the appraisal element of the common-sense model when investigating adherence to treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 718
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Why patients use alternative medicine - Results of a national study [J].
Astin, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (19) :1548-1553
[2]  
Attena F, 2000, COMPLEMENT THER MED, V8, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0965-2299(00)90781-7
[3]   A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow homoeopathic hospital [J].
Bikker, AP ;
Mercer, SW ;
Reilly, D .
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2005, 11 (04) :591-600
[4]   Why do people use different forms of complementary medicine? Multivariate associations between treatment and illness beliefs and complementary medicine use [J].
Bishop, Felicity L. ;
Yardley, Lucy ;
Lewith, George T. .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2006, 21 (05) :683-698
[5]   Developing a measure of treatment beliefs: The complementary and alternative medicine beliefs inventory [J].
Bishop, FL ;
Yardley, L ;
Lewith, G .
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2005, 13 (02) :144-149
[6]   From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions [J].
Bissell, P ;
May, CR ;
Noyce, PR .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 58 (04) :851-862
[7]   Surviving breast cancer - The role of complementary therapies [J].
Canales, MK ;
Geller, BM .
FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 26 (01) :11-24
[8]   THE MEANING OF MEDICATIONS - ANOTHER LOOK AT COMPLIANCE [J].
CONRAD, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1985, 20 (01) :29-37
[9]   Characteristics associated with reported CAM use in patients attending six GP practices in the Tayside and Grampian regions of Scotland: a survey [J].
Featherstone, C ;
Godden, D ;
Selvaraj, S ;
Emslie, M ;
Took-Zozaya, M .
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2003, 11 (03) :168-176
[10]   The health beliefs and behaviours of orthodox and complementary medicine clients [J].
Furnham, A ;
Kirkcaldy, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 35 :49-61