Economic analysis of the Spanish port sector reform during the 1990s

被引:37
作者
Castillo-Manzano, Jose I. [2 ]
Lopez-Valpuesta, Lourdes [2 ]
Perez, Javier J. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Cent Bank, Directorate Gen Econ, D-60311 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Seville, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Seville 41008, Spain
关键词
port devolution; maritime traffic; time series analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the matter of port legislation, the nineties was a period of maximum interest ill Spain. Two laws enacted in 1992 and 1997, respectively, aimed at increasing the autonomy of individual ports in the management and organization of its activities. Before 1992 two different models of management coexisted in the Spanish port system: autonomous decision-making ports and ports controlled in its decision-making by the Central Government. The question we address in this paper is how these legislative changes have affected the evolution of the levels of traffic of the Spanish port system from 1992, date of introduction of the first law, to 2003, date of approval of a third legislative change that remains out of this analysis for lack of sufficient data. We find an important impact of legislative changes on port traffic by way of an estimated econometric model over the 1966-2003 period. We control for the effect of other variables that might have influenced Spanish maritime traffic such as international maritime flows, taken as a proxy of globalization, or gross domestic product, under the hypothesis that maritime transport is a demand derived of economic activity. We provide evidence supporting that greater port autonomy had beneficial effects for the Spanish port system as a whole. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1063
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Globalisation and de-regulation in the maritime industry
    Alderton, T
    Winchester, N
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2002, 26 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [2] Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models
    Bai, J
    Perron, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 18 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [3] A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports
    Bichou, K
    Gray, R
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 39 (01) : 75 - 92
  • [4] BOX GEP, 1994, TIME SERIES ANAL
  • [5] CARVALHO M, 2007, IAME C 2007 GREEC
  • [6] The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry
    Cullinane, Kevin
    Ji, Ping
    Wang, Teng-Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2005, 57 (05) : 433 - 462
  • [7] de Vivero JLS, 2002, MAR POLICY, V26, P143
  • [8] Port devolution revisited: the case of regional ports and the role of lower tier governments
    Debrie, Jean
    Gouvernal, Elisabeth
    Slack, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 15 (06) : 455 - 464
  • [9] Estache A., 2004, UTIL POLICY, V12, P221, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JUP.2004.04.013
  • [10] Full cost recovery in EU ports operating as commercial undertakings
    Gardner, B
    Marlow, P
    Pettit, S
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2006, 13 (01) : 2 - 21