Salvage abdominal surgery in patients with a retained rectal stump after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled anastomosis

被引:26
作者
Tulchinsky, H [1 ]
McCourtney, JS [1 ]
Rao, KVS [1 ]
Chambers, W [1 ]
Williams, J [1 ]
Wilkinson, KH [1 ]
Nicholls, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Harrow HA1 3JU, Middx, England
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01931.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The introduction of surgical stapling instruments has widened the use of restorative proctocolectomy. Too high a distal transection of the rectum can, however, produce a retained rectal stump, which may cause symptoms. A study of the operative and functional data in a consecutive series of patients undergoing salvage surgery for retained rectal stump was undertaken. Methods: Twenty-five patients referred between January 1990 and September 2000 for pouch dysfunction were identified as having a retained rectal stump. Twenty-two underwent abdominoanal revision. The hospital notes were reviewed and function was assessed during outpatient visits, by postal questionnaire and by telephone interview. Results: Median operating time was 225 (range 170-340) min and median hospital stay was 15 (range 8-48) days. There was no operative death. Five pouches were excised. Seventeen patients were available for functional assessment. Median follow-up was 22.5 (range 4-114) months. Median 24-h frequency before and after operation was 12 (range 4-20) and 6 (range 3-12) respectively, and median night-time frequency was 4 (range 0-8) and 0.5 (range 0-4) respectively. Fifteen patients reported marked subjective improvement in pouch function and quality of life. Conclusion: Major revisional surgery for symptomatic retained rectal stump after restorative proctocolectomy, with stapled anastomosis was successful in 15 of 22 patients. These results are worse than the outcome following first-time restorative proctocolectomy with anastomosis constructed at the anal level. Pouch-rectal anastomosis should be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:1602 / 1606
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL-DISEASE [J].
BECKER, JM .
CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 9 (04) :600-615
[2]  
CARRARO PS, 1994, GUT, V35, P1721
[3]  
CARRARO PS, 1994, GUT, V35, P1070
[4]   Outcome of pouch related complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis [J].
Dayton, MT ;
Larsen, KP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 174 (06) :728-732
[5]   SYMPOSIUM - RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH ILEAL RESERVOIR [J].
DOZOIS, RR ;
GOLDBERG, SM ;
ROTHENBERGER, DA ;
UTSUNOMIYA, J ;
NICHOLLS, RJ ;
COHEN, Z ;
HULTEN, LAG ;
MOSKOWITZ, RL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1986, 1 (01) :2-19
[6]   ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSES COMPLICATIONS AND FUNCTION IN 1005 PATIENTS [J].
FAZIO, VW ;
ZIV, Y ;
CHURCH, JM ;
OAKLEY, JR ;
LAVERY, IC ;
MILSOM, JW ;
SCHROEDER, TK .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (02) :120-127
[7]   REDIVERSION AFTER ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - CAUSES OF FAILURES AND PREDICTORS OF SUBSEQUENT POUCH SALVAGE [J].
FOLEY, EF ;
SCHOETZ, DJ ;
ROBERTS, PL ;
MARCELLO, PW ;
MURRAY, JJ ;
COLLER, JA ;
VEIDENHEIMER, MC .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (08) :793-798
[8]   ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - REOPERATION FOR POUCH-RELATED COMPLICATIONS [J].
GALANDIUK, S ;
SCOTT, NA ;
DOZOIS, RR ;
KELLY, KA ;
ILSTRUP, DM ;
BEART, RW ;
WOLFF, BG ;
PEMBERTON, JH ;
NIVATVONGS, S ;
DEVINE, RM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 212 (04) :446-454
[9]  
GEMLO BT, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P784
[10]   STAPLED ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS - A TECHNIQUE TO AVOID MUCOSAL PROCTECTOMY IN THE ILEAL POUCH OPERATION [J].
HEALD, RJ ;
ALLEN, DR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (07) :571-572