Iterative design and testing of a hand-held, non-contact wound measurement device

被引:27
作者
Sprigle, Stephen [1 ]
Nemeth, Michelle [2 ]
Gajjala, Anita [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Rehabil Engn & Appl Res Lab, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Shepherd Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Wound measurement; Pressure ulcer; Reproducibility of results; Machine vision; RELIABILITY; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtv.2011.09.001
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
A variety of wound measurement techniques are available to clinicians. Options range from relatively simple and inexpensive to complex, expensive devices. An iterative design approach was used to evaluate and improve performance and clinical utility of a new wound measurement device (WMD). The design was based upon a commercially available Smartphone. Accuracy was assessed using bench testing and reliability of area measurements was determined using multiple evaluators. Clinical utility was investigated by deploying the WMD during wound rounds in a rehabilitation hospital. Accuracy testing revealed an average error <2% at 0 degrees or skew and an average error of 4.28% at 10 degrees of skew. The intra-rater reliability exceeded 0.975 for all raters and inter-rater reliability was 0.966. Clinical utility testing provided the opportunity to address several usability concerns including the software interface and computation times. The accuracy and reliability of a new, non-contact wound measurement device exceeded that of other manual techniques and were, at least, equivocal to other computer-based technologies. Some limitations of using a Smartphone were identified by the clinicians that can be addressed by the more advanced processing power of newer technology. Overall, the WMD was shown to have the potential as a useful clinical tool. (c) 2011 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 26
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR MEASURING RATES OF CUTANEOUS HEALING - A COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES [J].
BULSTRODE, CJK ;
GOODE, AW ;
SCOTT, PJ .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1986, 71 (04) :437-443
[2]  
Duckworth M, 2007, P REH ENG ASS TECHN
[3]   A NEW MEANS OF ASSESSING HEALING IN CHRONIC VENOUS ULCERATION [J].
KATELARIS, P ;
FLETCHER, JP ;
LITTLE, JM .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 56 (02) :99-102
[4]  
Krouskop TA, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P337
[5]   A NEW WAY TO SIZE UP A WOUND [J].
KUNDIN, JI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1989, 89 (02) :206-207
[6]  
Langemo D K, 2001, Adv Skin Wound Care, V14, P190, DOI 10.1097/00129334-200107000-00011
[7]  
Langemo D K, 1998, Adv Wound Care, V11, P337
[8]   RELIABILITY OF WOUND SURFACE-AREA MEASUREMENTS [J].
MAJESKE, C .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1992, 72 (02) :138-141
[9]   Wound Areas by Computerized Planimetry of Digital Images: Accuracy and Reliability [J].
Mayrovitz, Harvey N. ;
Soontupe, Lisa B. .
ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2009, 22 (05) :222-229
[10]  
PALMER RM, 1989, J PHOTOGR SCI, V37, P65