Biological fermentative hydrogen and ethanol production using continuous stirred tank reactor

被引:21
作者
Han, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Hong [1 ]
Jiao, Anying [1 ]
Wang, Zhanqing [1 ]
Li, Yongfeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ren, Nanqi [3 ]
机构
[1] NE Forestry Univ, Sch Forestry, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Engn & Sci, Coll Chem & Chem Engn, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
关键词
Fermentative hydrogen production; Organic loading rate; Energy conversion rate; Continuous flow; BIOHYDROGEN PRODUCTION; PH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.048
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrogen and ethanol are promising biofuels and have great potential to become alternatives to fossil fuels. The influence of organic loading rates (OLRs) on the production of fermentative hydrogen and ethanol were investigated in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) from fermentation using molasses as substrate. Four OLRs were examined, ranging from 8 to 32 kg/m(3).d. The H-2 and ethanol production rate in CSTR initially increased with increasing OLR (from 8 to 24 kg/m(3) d). The highest H-2 production rate (12.4 mmol/h 1) and ethanol production rate (20.27 mmol/h 1) were obtained in CSTR both operated at OLR = 24 kg/m(3) d. However, the H-2 and ethanol production rate tended to decrease with an increase of OLR to 32 kg/m(3) d. The liquid fermentation products were dominated by ethanol, accounting for 31-59% of total soluble metabolities. Linear regression results show that ethanol production rate ( y) and H-2 production rate (x) were proportionately correlated which can be expressed as y = 0.5431x + 1.6816 (r(2) = 0.7617). The total energy conversion rate based on the heat values of H-2 and ethanol was calculated to assess the overall efficiency of energy conversion rate. The best energy conversion rate was 31.23 kJ/h 1, occurred at OLR = 24 kg/m3 d. Copyright (C) 2011, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 847
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Effects of temperature and substrate concentration on biological hydrogen production from starch
    Akutsu, Yohei
    Li, Yu-You
    Harada, Hideki
    Yu, Han-Qing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (06) : 2558 - 2566
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, V19th
  • [3] Fermentative hydrogen production by diverse microflora
    Baghchehsaraee, Bita
    Nakhla, George
    Karamanev, Dimitre
    Margaritis, Argyrios
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) : 5021 - 5027
  • [4] Biological hydrogen production in suspended and attached growth anaerobic reactor systems
    Gavala, Hariklia N.
    Skiadas, Ioannis V.
    Ahring, Birgitte K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2006, 31 (09) : 1164 - 1175
  • [5] Biological hydrogen production; fundamentals and limiting processes
    Hallenbeck, PC
    Benemann, JR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2002, 27 (11-12) : 1185 - 1193
  • [6] Sustainable fermentative hydrogen production: challenges for process optimisation
    Hawkes, FR
    Dinsdale, R
    Hawkes, DL
    Hussy, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2002, 27 (11-12) : 1339 - 1347
  • [7] Anaerobic bio-hydrogen production from ethanol fermentation: the role of pH
    Hwang, MH
    Jang, NJ
    Hyun, SH
    Kim, IS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 111 (03) : 297 - 309
  • [8] Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products
    Khanal, SK
    Chen, WH
    Li, L
    Sung, SW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2004, 29 (11) : 1123 - 1131
  • [9] Ecological mechanism of fermentative hydrogen production by bacteria
    Li, Yong Feng
    Ren, Nan Qi
    Chen, Ying
    Zheng, Guo Xiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (06) : 755 - 760
  • [10] Comparison of biohydrogen production processes
    Manish, S.
    Banerjee, Rangan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2008, 33 (01) : 279 - 286