共 36 条
What does 2-dimensional Imaging add to 3-and 4-dimensional obstetric ultrasonography?
被引:37
作者:
Goncalves, Luis F.
Nien, Jyh Kae
Espinoza, Jimmy
Kusanovic, Juan Pedro
Lee, Wesley
Swope, Betsy
Soto, Eleazar
Treadwell, Marjorie C.
Romero, Roberto
机构:
[1] Wayne State Univ, Hutzel Womens Hosp, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, NIH,NICHHD,Perinatol Res Branch, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] NICHHD, Perinatol Res Branch, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Ctr Mol Med & Genet, Detroit, MI USA
[5] William Beaumont Hosp, Div Fetal Imaging, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
关键词:
accuracy;
congenital anomalies;
fetus;
4-dimensional ultrasonography;
prenatal diagnosis;
sonographic tomography;
spatiotemporal image correlation;
3-dimensional ultrasonography;
D O I:
10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.691
中图分类号:
O42 [声学];
学科分类号:
070206 ;
082403 ;
摘要:
Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 2-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography adds diagnostic information to that provided by the examination of 3-dimensional/4-dimensional (3D/4D) volume data sets alone. Methods. Ninety-nine fetuses were examined by 3D/4D volume ultrasonography. Volume data sets were evaluated by a blinded independent examiner who, after establishing an initial diagnostic impression by 3D/4D ultrasonography, performed a 2D ultrasonographic examination. The frequency of agreement and diagnostic accuracy of each modality to detect congenital anomalies were calculated and compared. Results. Fifty-four fetuses with no abnormalities and 45 fetuses with 82 anomalies diagnosed by 2D ultrasonography were examined. Agreement between 3D/4D and 2D ultrasonography occurred for 90.4% of the findings (123/136; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.834; 95% confidence interval, 0.774-0.879). Six anomalies were missed by 3D/4D ultrasonography when compared to 2D ultrasonography (ventricular septal defect [n = 2], interrupted inferior vena cava with azygous continuation [n = 1], tetralogy of Fallot (n = 1], horseshoe kidney [n = 11, and cystic adenomatoid malformation [n = 1]). There were 2 discordant diagnoses: transposition of the great arteries diagnosed as a double-outlet right ventricle and pulmonary atresia misinterpreted as tricuspid atresia on 3D/4D ultrasonography. One case of occult spinal dysraphism was suspected on 3D ultrasonography but not confirmed by 2D ultrasonography. When compared to diagnoses performed after delivery (n = 106), the sensitivity and specificity of 3D/4D ultrasonography (92.2% [47/51] and 76.4% [42/55], respectively) and 2D ultrasonography (96.1 % [49/51] and 72.7% [40/55]) were not significantly different (P =.233). Conclusions. Information provided by 2D ultrasonography is consistent, in most cases, with information provided by the examination of 3D/4D volume data sets alone.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 699
页数:9
相关论文