The MSC experience: developing an operational certification standard and a market incentive to improve fishery sustainability

被引:48
作者
Agnew, D. J. [1 ]
Gutierrez, N. L. [1 ]
Stern-Pirlot, A. [1 ]
Hoggarth, D. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Marine Stewardship Council, London EC1A 2DH, England
关键词
certification; eco-labelling; global fisheries management best practices; Marine Stewardship Council; MARINE STEWARDSHIP; SEAFOOD; CONSERVATION; PATTERNS; IMPACTS; STOCKS;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fst091
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) standard for sustainable fisheries is represented by three high-level principles and a set of 31 indicators and scoring guidelines, known as the "default assessment tree". Over the 14 years, since it was developed in 1999, the MSC has faced the challenge of maintaining its standard at the level of global best practice, keeping up with developments in the science and management of fisheries, and making sure that certified fisheries maintain their performance at that standard, or raise it where they fall below it. The MSC has had to regularly and widely engage with multiple stakeholders to ensure that its policy development is consistent with stakeholder expectations. Although many fisheries have made significant improvements to their performance, sometimes performance has declined, leading to further requirements for improvement. The MSC needed to design a program that balances credibility, accessibility, and improvement to move the world's fisheries towards sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 225
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Rebuttal to Froese and Proelss "Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood" [J].
Agnew, D. J. ;
Gutierrez, N. L. ;
Stern-Pirlot, A. ;
Smith, A. D. M. ;
Zimmermann, C. ;
Sainsbury, K. .
MARINE POLICY, 2013, 38 :551-553
[2]  
Albatross Task Force, 2012, INF SUCC TRAWL LONGL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture
[4]   The 'devils triangle' of MSC certification: Balancing credibility, accessibility and continuous improvement [J].
Bush, Simon R. ;
Toonen, Hilde ;
Oosterveer, Peter ;
Mol, Arthur P. J. .
MARINE POLICY, 2013, 37 :288-293
[5]   Rebuilding EU fish stocks and fisheries, a process under way? [J].
Cardinale, M. ;
Doerner, H. ;
Abella, A. ;
Andersen, J. L. ;
Casey, J. ;
Doering, R. ;
Kirkegaard, E. ;
Motova, A. ;
Anderson, J. ;
Simmonds, E. J. ;
Stransky, C. .
MARINE POLICY, 2013, 39 :43-52
[6]   Managing fisheries to conserve the Antarctic marine ecosystem: practical implementation of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) [J].
Constable, AJ ;
de la Mare, WK ;
Agnew, DJ ;
Everson, I ;
Miller, D .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2000, 57 (03) :778-791
[7]   Status and Solutions for the World's Unassessed Fisheries [J].
Costello, Christopher ;
Ovando, Daniel ;
Hilborn, Ray ;
Gaines, Steven D. ;
Deschenes, Olivier ;
Lester, Sarah E. .
SCIENCE, 2012, 338 (6106) :517-520
[8]   Small pelagics in upwelling systems:: patterns of interaction and structural changes in "wasp-waist" ecosystems [J].
Cury, P ;
Bakun, A ;
Crawford, RJM ;
Jarre, A ;
Quiñones, RA ;
Shannon, LJ ;
Verheye, HM .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2000, 57 (03) :603-618
[9]  
DAFF, 2010, FISH STAT REP
[10]  
EC, 2006, COM2006360 EC