Close Resection Margins Do Not Influence Local Recurrence in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study

被引:1
作者
Stathopoulos, Panagiotis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Smith, William P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dublin Dent Univ Hosp, 2 Lincoln Pl, Dublin D02 VX37, Ireland
[2] St James Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Mater Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Northampton Gen Hosp, Northampton, England
关键词
SURGICAL MARGIN; NECK-CANCER; SURVIVAL; HEAD; TONGUE; SURGERY; PERSPECTIVE; CAVITY; MOUTH; FLOOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2017.10.025
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigated the clinical relevance of the distance between the resection margin and tumor cells of the primary sites for oral squamous cell carcinoma, with particular attention to local recurrence rate. Patients and Methods: All patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma from 1995 to 2006 and treated primarily with surgery formed the initial cohort of the study. Patient with various degrees of dysplasia in the margin, patients who received radiotherapy, and patients who died of causes other than oral cancer were excluded. Margins 1 to 5 mm were considered close. A margin of at least 5 mm was considered free of disease (clear). Local recurrence was defined as tumor development at the site of the primary tumor during the follow-up period (>= 5 yr). The Fisher exact test was used to determine the relevance of the differences between the studied groups (free vs close margins) in relation to local recurrence. Results: Histologic analysis of the specimens was performed. Of the 53 patients, 32 had free margins and 3 of the 32 had a local recurrence. In addition, 21 patients had close margins and 3 of the 21 had a local recurrence. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically relevant. Conclusions: The authors advocate that the strategy of using close resection margins as a generic indicator for local recurrence and adverse prognosis might have to be reassessed. The histopathologic evidence of tumor cells within a distance less than 0.5 cm from the surgical margins does not necessarily seem to offer a certain indication for additional treatment. Other prognostic factors, such as involvement of cervical lymph nodes and tumor depth, must be considered in the decision making for further treatment. (C) 2017 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 876
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Early stage carcinoma of oral tongue: prognostic factors for local control and survival [J].
Al-Rajhi, N ;
Khafaga, Y ;
El-Husseiny, J ;
Saleem, M ;
Mourad, W ;
Al-Otieschan, A ;
Al-Amro, A .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 36 (06) :508-514
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, EVALUATION STAGING P
[3]  
Barrellier P, REV STOMATOL CHIR MA, V92, P39
[4]   Surgical excision margins: A pathologist's perspective [J].
Batsakis, JG .
ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 1999, 6 (03) :140-148
[5]   The clinical significance of the positive surgical margin in oral cancer [J].
Binahmed, Abdulaziz ;
Nason, Richard W. ;
Abdoh, Ahmed A. .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 43 (08) :780-784
[6]   MOLECULAR ASSESSMENT OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STAGING IN SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK [J].
BRENNAN, JA ;
MAO, L ;
HRUBAN, RH ;
BOYLE, JO ;
EBY, YJ ;
KOCH, WM ;
GOODMAN, SN ;
SIDRANSKY, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (07) :429-435
[7]   Factors affecting survival in patients with oral cancer: an Australian perspective [J].
Chandu, A ;
Adams, G ;
Smith, ACH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 34 (05) :514-520
[8]   Recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck: treatment strategies and survival analysis in a 20-year period [J].
Eckardt, A ;
Barth, EL ;
Kokemueller, H ;
Wegener, G .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 40 (04) :427-432
[9]   IMPROVED SURVIVAL IN THE TREATMENT OF SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF THE ORAL TONGUE [J].
FRANCESCHI, D ;
GUPTA, R ;
SPIRO, RH ;
SHAH, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 166 (04) :360-365
[10]  
Helliwell TR, 2005, DATASETS HISTOPATHOL