Diagnostic and Prognostic Performances Over 9 Years of a Selective Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Cohort of 18,775 Subjects

被引:65
作者
Cosson, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Benbara, Amelie [3 ]
Pharisien, Isabelle [3 ]
Minh Tuan Nguyen [1 ,2 ]
Revaux, Aurelie [3 ]
Lormeau, Boris [1 ]
Sandre-Banon, Dorian [1 ]
Assad, Nabil [1 ]
Pillegand, Camille [1 ]
Valensi, Paul [1 ]
Carbillon, Lionel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 13, Ctr Rech Nutr Humaine Ile de France, Dept Endocrinol Diabetol Nutr, Jean Verdier Hosp,AP HP, Bondy, France
[2] Univ Paris 13, Unite Rech Epidemiol Nutr, INSERM, U11125,INRA,CNAM,UMR U557, Bobigny, France
[3] Univ Paris 13, Jean Verdier Hosp, AP HP, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bondy, France
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; DEFINITION; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; INDICATORS; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; FETAL;
D O I
10.2337/dc12-1428
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE-We aimed to evaluate a selective screening strategy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on the presence of risk factors: BMI >= kg/m(2), age >= 35 years, family history of diabetes, personal history of GDM, or birth of a child with macrosomia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Of 20,630 deliveries between 2002 and 2010, we selected 18,775 deliveries in women with no known diabetes and for whom all risk factors were known. GDM was universally screened and defined as fasting plasma glucose level >= 5.3 mmol/L and/or 2-h postload (75 g) glucose level >= 7.8 mmol/L. RESULTS-The prevalence of at least one risk factor has increased since 2002 (P < 0.001) from 51.7 to 61.5%, with no change in the GDM prevalence (mean 14.4%, intention to screen). At least one risk factor was present in 58.5% of women who represented 65.3% of all those with GDM. The presence of risk factors was significantly associated with GDM (odds ratio 1.4 [95% CI 1.3-1.51, P < 0.001) and with GDM-related events (preeclampsia/large for gestational age/dystocia) (P < 0.001) with the following incidences: no GDM/no risk factor 8.8%, no GDM/risk factor 11.1%, GDM/no risk factor 16.7%, and GDM/risk factor 18.2%. CONCLUSIONS-The presence of risk factors increased during the last decade. This condition is predictive of GDM and GDM-related events. However, a selective screening would lead to missing one-third of the women with GDM who, even without risk factors, had more events than women without GDM. Therefore, these data stand against the present selective screening currently proposed in the French guidelines. Diabetes Care 36:598-603,2013
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 603
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Alberti KGMM, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P539, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Diabetes Metab, V36, P695, DOI 10.1016/j.diabet.2010.11.019
[4]  
Benchimol M, 2006, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, V34, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.11.010
[5]   Maternal outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus [J].
Beucher, G. ;
de Lesegno, B. Viaris ;
Dreyfus, M. .
DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2010, 36 (06) :522-537
[6]  
Charles MA, 2008, OBESITY, V16, P2180, DOI [10.1038/oby.2008.286, 10.1038/oby.2008.285]
[7]   Universal rather than selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus may improve fetal outcomes [J].
Cosson, E ;
Benchimol, M ;
Carbillon, L ;
Pharisien, I ;
Pariès, J ;
Valensi, P ;
Lormeau, B ;
Bolie, S ;
Uzan, M ;
Attali, JR .
DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2006, 32 (02) :140-146
[8]   Diagnostic criteria For gestational diabetes mellitus [J].
Cosson, E. .
DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2010, 36 (06) :538-548
[9]   Definition, epidemiology, risk factors [J].
Galtier, F. .
DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2010, 36 (06) :628-651
[10]   Universal vs. risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: detection rates, gestation at diagnosis and outcome [J].
Griffin, ME ;
Coffey, M ;
Johnson, H ;
Scanlon, P ;
Foley, M ;
Stronge, J ;
O'Meara, NM ;
Firth, RG .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (01) :26-32