Coupling of bromide and on-line mechanical modified fly ash for mercury removal at a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant

被引:31
作者
Wang, Shumin [1 ]
Zhang, Yongsheng [2 ]
Gu, Yongzheng [1 ]
Wang, Jiawei [2 ]
Yu, Xuehai [1 ]
Wang, Tao [2 ]
Sun, Zhongchun [1 ]
Liu, Zhao [2 ]
Romero, Carlos E. [3 ]
Pan, Wei-ping [2 ]
机构
[1] China Energy Investment Corp Ltd, Beijing 100011, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Key Lab Condit Monitoring & Control Power Plant E, Minist Educ, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Lehigh Univ, Energy Res Ctr, 117 ATLSS Dr, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mercury; Fly ash; Bromide; On-line modified; Coal-fired power plant; SURFACE MODIFICATION; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; FLUE-GAS; ADSORPTION; EMISSIONS; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.053
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Modified fly ash is a potential competitive sorbent for flue gas mercury remove in coal-fired power plant. The adsorption characteristics of coal fly ash under different temperature and modification methods were studied. On-line modified fly ash as a sorbent for mercury removal at a coal-fired power plant was carried out. The results of laboratory show that the adsorption performance of a coupled bromide and mechanical modified fly ash was better than that of inherent fly ash and mechanical modified fly ash. Furthermore, it was found that high temperatures are more favorable for mercury adsorption. In a demonstration at a full-scale 1000 MW coal-fired power plant unit, injection of the bromide and mechanical modified fly ash resulted in a decrease of the total concentration of mercury emissions at the stack. Additionally, a decrease in Hg2+ from the SCR to the ESP was found. When injected modified fly ash, the final emission concentration of mercury at the unit outlet reached 1.15 mu g/m(3), with a mercury emission reduction efficiency of 56.1%.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 186
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Surface modification of activated carbon for adsorption of SO2 and NOX: A review of existing and emerging technologies
    Abdulrasheed, A. A.
    Jalil, A. A.
    Triwahyono, S.
    Zaini, M. A. A.
    Gambo, Y.
    Ibrahim, M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 : 1067 - 1085
  • [2] Hydrogen-rich gas production through steam gasification of charcoal pellet
    Bartocci, P.
    Zampilli, M.
    Bidini, G.
    Fantozzi, F.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 132 : 817 - 823
  • [3] First full-scale demonstration of mercury control in Alberta
    Brown, Terry
    Lissianski, Vitali
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 90 (11) : 1412 - 1418
  • [4] Enhancement of Mercury Capture by the Simultaneous Addition of Hydrogen Bromide (HBr) and Fly Ashes in a Slipstream Facility
    Cao, Yan
    Wang, Guan-Hai
    Li, Jun
    Cheng, Jen-Chieh
    Chan, Chia-Chun
    Cohron, Marten
    Pan, Wei-Ping
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (08) : 2812 - 2817
  • [5] Partitioning of Mercury, Arsenic, Selenium, Boron, and Chloride in a Full-Scale Coal Combustion Process Equipped with Selective Catalytic Reduction, Electrostatic Precipitation, and Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
    Cheng, Chin-Min
    Hack, Pauline
    Chu, Paul
    Chang, Yung-Nan
    Lin, Ting-Yu
    Ko, Chih-Sheng
    Chiang, Po-Han
    He, Cheng-Chun
    Lai, Yuan-Min
    Pan, Wei-Ping
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2009, 23 (10) : 4805 - 4816
  • [6] Evaluation of elemental mercury adsorption by fly ash modified with ammonium bromide
    Gu, Yongzheng
    Zhang, Yongsheng
    Lin, Lvrong
    Xu, Hong
    Orndorff, William
    Pan, Wei-Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2015, 119 (03) : 1663 - 1672
  • [7] Impact of additives for enhanced sulfur dioxide removal on re-emissions of mercury in wet flue gas desulfurization
    Heidel, Barna
    Hilber, Melanie
    Scheffknecht, Gunter
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 114 : 485 - 491
  • [8] Mercury capture by native fly ash carbons in coal-fired power plants
    Hower, James C.
    Senior, Constance L.
    Suuberg, Eric M.
    Hurt, Robert H.
    Wilcox, Jennifer L.
    Olson, Edwin S.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2010, 36 (04) : 510 - 529
  • [9] Laudal D., 2002, EVALUATION MERCURY S
  • [10] Miller BG., 2015, Fossil fuel emissions control technologies: stationary heat and power systems