Emergency cricothyroidotomy: a randomised crossover study of four methods

被引:41
作者
Dimitriadis, J. C. [2 ]
Paoloni, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Concord Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05631.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Emergency physicians and registrars performed emergency cricothyroidotomy on an artificial airway model using a standard surgical approach and three common commercial products, participants bad received no refresher training. The order in which the methods were used was randomised to minimise any learning effect. Three methods (standard surgical, Minitrach II, and Quicktrach) were universally successful in obtaining ventilation within 150 s, whilst the Melker kit had a 26%, failure rate and significantly longer median time to ventilation (126 s vs <= 48 s for other methods, p < 0.001). Despite success ill using the surgical method, the Quicktrach and Minitrach II were rated as First or second preference by the majority of operators (78%, and 70%, respectively). Without refresher training emergency physicians and registrars successfully performed emergency cricothyroidotomy using the standard surgical method, Quicktrach mid Minitrach 11 kits however the use of the Melker kit under these conditions resulted in significant delays or to establish an airway.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1208
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Caplan RA, 2003, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V98, P1269
[2]   Comparison of wire-guided cricothyrotomy versus standard surgical cricothyrotomy technique [J].
Chan, TC ;
Vilke, GM ;
Bramwell, KJ ;
Davis, DP ;
Hamilton, RS ;
Rosen, P .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 17 (06) :957-962
[3]   A stab in the dark! Are you ready to perform needle cricothyroidotomy? [J].
Davies, P .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1999, 30 (10) :659-662
[4]   Comparison of conventional surgical versus Seldinger technique emergency cricothyrotomy performed by inexperienced clinicians [J].
Eisenburger, P ;
Laczika, K ;
List, M ;
Wilfing, A ;
Losert, H ;
Hofbauer, R ;
Burgmann, H ;
Bankl, H ;
Pikula, B ;
Benumof, JL ;
Frass, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (03) :687-690
[5]   Emergency cricothyrotomy: a randomised crossover trial comparing the wire-guided and catheter-over-needle techniques [J].
Fikkers, BG ;
van Vugt, S ;
van der Hoeven, JG ;
van den Hoogen, FJA ;
Marres, HAM .
ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (10) :1008-1011
[6]   Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation [J].
Henderson, JJ ;
Popat, MT ;
Latto, IP ;
Pearce, AC .
ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (07) :675-694
[7]   Difficult airway equipment in departments English emergency departments [J].
Morton, T ;
Brady, S ;
Clancy, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (05) :485-488
[8]  
Roberts JHJ., 2004, Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine., V4th
[9]   Evaluation of Seldinger technique emergency cricothyroidotomy versus standard surgical cricothyroidotomy in 200 cadavers [J].
Schaumann, N ;
Lorenz, V ;
Schellongowski, P ;
Staudinger, T ;
Locker, GJ ;
Burgmann, H ;
Pikula, B ;
Hofbauer, R ;
Schuster, E ;
Frass, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (01) :7-11
[10]   Surgical vs wire-guided cricothyroidotomy:: a randomised crossover study of cuffed and uncuffed tracheal tube insertion [J].
Sulaiman, L. ;
Tighe, S. Q. M. ;
Nelson, R. A. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 61 (06) :565-570