The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis

被引:80
作者
Fitzal, F. [1 ]
Krois, W. [1 ]
Trischler, H. [1 ]
Wutzel, L. [1 ]
Riedl, O.
Kuehbelboeck, U. [1 ]
Wintersteiner, B. [1 ]
Cardoso, M. J. [2 ]
Dubsky, P. [1 ]
Gnant, M. [1 ]
Jakesz, R. [1 ]
Wild, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Surg 21 A, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Hosp S Joao, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
patient evaluation; breast surgery; quality of life; surgical outcome;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The cosmetic result after breast surgery is an important marker in clinical studies. Most authors used subjective scales to judge breast cosmesis. However, inter-observer discrepancies are very high and the use of such subjective scales for prospective trials is highly disputed. In this study we present for the first time a new invented breast symmetry index This BSI is calculated by subtracting the size and the shape between both breasts (frontal view and side view). The BSI is measured with a software system called breast analysing too( (BAT (c))) from digital. photographs. The photographs of 27 patients have been analysed with this software by different physicians to evolve inter-observer reproducibility. The Harris scale for subjective cosmetic analyses has been correlated with the BSI. In our study the inter-observer reproducibility was excellent (Pearson correlation r = 0.9; p < 0.05) and the 1351 was able to significantly differentiate between good and bad cosmesis (BSI values from 0%d to 30%d is good, BSI > 30%d is bad cosmesis). Thus the BSI may be used for clinical studies. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 435
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Interobserver agreement and consensus over the esthetic evaluation of conservative treatment for breast cancer [J].
Cardoso, MJ ;
Cardoso, J ;
Santos, AC ;
Barros, H ;
de Oliveira, MC .
BREAST, 2006, 15 (01) :52-57
[2]   Choosing observers for evaluation of aesthetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment [J].
Cardoso, MJ ;
Santos, AC ;
Cardoso, J ;
Barros, H ;
De Oliveira, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :879-881
[3]   Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: A comprehensive review of the literature [J].
Ching, S ;
Thoma, A ;
McCabe, RE ;
Antony, MM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (01) :469-480
[4]   ANALYSIS OF COSMETIC RESULTS FOLLOWING PRIMARY RADIATION-THERAPY FOR STAGE-1 AND STAGE-2 CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST [J].
HARRIS, JR ;
LEVENE, MB ;
SVENSSON, G ;
HELLMAN, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1979, 5 (02) :257-261
[5]   C-ELEGANS CELL-SURVIVAL GENE CED-9 ENCODES A FUNCTIONAL HOMOLOG OF THE MAMMALIAN PROTOONCOGENE BCL-2 [J].
HENGARTNER, MO ;
HORVITZ, HR .
CELL, 1994, 76 (04) :665-676
[6]   A body image scale for use with cancer patients [J].
Hopwood, P ;
Fletcher, I ;
Lee, A ;
Ghazal, SA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (02) :189-197
[7]   BREAST RETRACTION ASSESSMENT - MULTIPLE VARIABLE ANALYSIS OF FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR COSMETIC RETRACTION IN PATIENTS TREATED CONSERVATIVELY FOR STAGE-I OR STAGE-II BREAST-CARCINOMA [J].
PEZNER, RD ;
PATTERSON, MP ;
HILL, LR ;
VORA, NL ;
DESAI, KR ;
LIPSETT, JA .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA ONCOLOGY, 1985, 24 (04) :327-330
[8]   COSMETIC EVALUATION OF BREAST CONSERVING TREATMENT FOR MAMMARY-CANCER .2. A QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF RADIATION-DOSE, FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES AND SURGICAL-TREATMENT TECHNIQUES ON COSMETIC RESULTS [J].
VANLIMBERGEN, E ;
RIJNDERS, A ;
VANDERSCHUEREN, E ;
LERUT, T ;
CHRISTIAENS, R .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 16 (04) :253-267
[9]   COSMETIC EVALUATION OF BREAST CONSERVING TREATMENT FOR MAMMARY-CANCER .1. PROPOSAL OF A QUANTITATIVE SCORING SYSTEM [J].
VANLIMBERGEN, E ;
VANDERSCHUEREN, E ;
VANTONGELEN, K .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 16 (03) :159-167
[10]   The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial [J].
Vrieling, C ;
Collette, L ;
Fourquet, A ;
Hoogenraad, WJ ;
Horiot, JC ;
Jager, JJ ;
Pierart, M ;
Poortmans, PM ;
Struikmans, H ;
Maat, B ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Bartelink, H .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 55 (03) :219-232