Assessing Regional Differences in Green Innovation Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises in China

被引:145
作者
Du, Jun-liang [1 ]
Liu, Yong [1 ]
Diao, Wei-xue [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Wuxi 214122, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
green technology innovation; R&D stage; transformation stage; efficiency measurement; difference; three wastes; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECO-INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph16060940
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green technology innovation is an important means to break out of the constraints of resources and the environment, enhance the competitiveness of enterprises, and achieve the upgrading of industrial structures, and promote high-quality economic growth. In order to realize the overall improvement of the green technology innovation capability of Chinese enterprises, it is necessary to measure the efficiency of industrial enterprises' green technology innovation and explore their regional differences. In this paper, from the perspective of a two-stage innovation value chain, by introducing the industrial carbon emissions per unit of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the three wastes pollutants into the research framework of green technology innovation efficiency, we established a novel green innovation efficiency evaluation indicator system for industrial enterprises. Furthermore, we used a two-stage network DEA with shared input to measure the efficiency of regional enterprises' green technology innovation and explored the regional differences in industrial enterprises' green technology R&D and the efficiency of green technology achievement transformation. Finally, we provide some suggestions for improving China's industrial enterprises' green innovation efficiency, so that they can ameliorate the significant regional imbalances and differences and realize high-quality economic growth.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   An economic-ecological model to evaluate impacts of nutrient abatement in the Baltic Sea [J].
Ahlvik, Lassi ;
Ekholm, Petri ;
Hyytiainen, Kari ;
Pitkanen, Heikki .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 55 :164-175
[2]   Corporate governance and green innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Bennedsen, Morten .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 :54-72
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, IEEP
[4]   Green technology and eco-innovation Seven case-studies from a Russian manufacturing context [J].
Bartlett, Dean ;
Trifilova, Anna .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 21 (08) :910-+
[5]  
Brawn E., 1994, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V6, P498
[6]  
Cao X., 2016, J Chin Popul Res, V37, P63
[7]   Environmental innovation and environmental performance [J].
Carrion-Flores, Carmen E. ;
Innes, Robert .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 59 (01) :27-42
[8]   Environmental orientation and corporate performance: The mediation mechanism of green supply chain management and moderating effect of competitive intensity [J].
Chan, Ricky Y. K. ;
He, Hongwei ;
Chan, Hing Kai ;
Wang, William Y. C. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 41 (04) :621-630
[9]  
[陈凯华 CHEN Kaihua], 2011, [系统工程理论与实践, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice], V31, P1211
[10]   Threshold management in a coupled economic-ecological system [J].
Chen, Yong ;
Jayaprakash, Ciriyam ;
Irwin, Elena .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 64 (03) :442-455