Classifying Community Colleges Based on Students' Patterns of Use

被引:13
作者
Bahr, Peter Riley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, Ctr Study Higher & Postsecondary Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Community college; Accountability; Performance; Classification; Type; Typology; Taxonomy; Cluster analysis; HIGHER-EDUCATION; 2-YEAR COLLEGES; OUTCOME EQUITY; SUCCESS; CLASSIFICATION; INSTITUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; DIRECTIONS; CHALLENGES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1007/s11162-012-9272-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this study, I draw on Bahr's (Research in Higher Education 51:724-749, 2010; New Directions for Institutional Research S1:33-48, 2011) behavioral typology of first-time community college students to examine college-level variation in students' patterns of use of 105 community colleges in California. I find that students' patterns of use vary greatly across the colleges, and, further, these patterns tend to cluster in such a fashion that colleges may be classified based on dominant or disproportionate patterns of use. Using k-means cluster analysis, I identify five types of community colleges, including Community Education Intensive, Transfer Intensive, Workforce Development Intensive, High-Risk Intensive, and Mixed Use. I describe each of these community college types and then investigate whether the patterns of student use that characterize the identified types appear to be primarily a consequence of institutional policies and practices or, conversely, a product of localized community demand and the associated circumstances and choices of the students who attend a given college. The evidence, though limited, tends to support the latter: variation in patterns of student use across institutions appears to be primarily a product of localized community demand. Finally, I draw on established performance indicators to examine the implications of the identified patterns of student use for observed institutional performance. I find that institutions that differ in terms of dominant or disproportionate patterns of student use also differ significantly and systematically on a number of measures of institutional performance.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 460
页数:28
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Adelman C., 1992, WAY WE ARE AM COMMUN
[2]  
Adelman C., 2005, MOV TOWN MOV COMM CO
[3]   The changing face of accountability - Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education [J].
Alexander, FK .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2000, 71 (04) :411-+
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CLUSTER ANAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005 ANN FOR ASS I R
[6]  
Bahr P. R., 2011, NEW DIRECTIONS I R S, VS1, P33
[7]  
Bahr P. R, 2013, COMMUNITY C IN PRESS, V41
[8]  
Bahr P.R., 2004, Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, V12, P7
[9]  
Bahr P.R., 2012, First in line: Student registration priority in community colleges
[10]  
Bahr P.R., 2005, Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, V13, P73