Rats Show Adaptive Choice in a Metacognitive Task With High Uncertainty

被引:20
作者
Yuki, Shoko [1 ]
Okanoya, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Life Sci, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Tokyo 1138654, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION | 2017年 / 43卷 / 01期
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
rats; metacognition; uncertainty; delayed matching to place task; task chance level; MACAQUES MACACA-MULATTA; MONKEYS CEBUS-APELLA; RHESUS-MONKEYS; ANIMAL-METACOGNITION; BEHAVIOR; RESPONSES; METAMEMORY; NOVELTY; SEEKING; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1037/xan0000130
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Metacognition refers to the use of one's cognitive processes to coordinate behavior. Many higher cognitive functions such as feeling-of-knowing judgment and theory of mind are thought to be meta-cognitive processes. Although some primate species also show this ability in the form of behavioral control, a rodent model of metacognition is required for advanced studies of this phenomenon at behavioral, molecular, and neural levels. Here we show that rats could reliably be trained in a metacognitive task. The rats were trained to remember the location of a nose-poke hole and later indicate the location via a behavioral task. Rats had options of either demonstrating their memory or switching to an easier task (escape). Four rats were used in a two-choice metacognitive task, and 3 were used in a six-choice task. In the six-choice task, rats increased the likelihood of receiving a reward by utilizing the option to escape, in exchange for a decrease in the amount of reward received per correct trial. Furthermore, rats escaped more in sample-omitted trials than in standard trials. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that rats have metacognition, and could be utilized as a benchmark for further metacognition studies in rats. However, rats in the two-choice task did not use the escape response adaptively. These results were consistent with those seen in capuchin monkeys. Similarity between rodents and primates in task switching should expand the possibility of comparative studies of metacognition.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample [J].
Adams, Allison ;
Santi, Angelo .
LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 39 (01) :1-11
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
[3]   Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task [J].
Balcomb, Frances K. ;
Gerken, LouAnn .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2008, 11 (05) :750-760
[4]   Evaluation of Seven Hypotheses for Metamemory Performance in Rhesus Monkeys [J].
Basile, Benjamin M. ;
Schroeder, Gabriel R. ;
Brown, Emily Kathryn ;
Templer, Victoria L. ;
Hampton, Robert R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2015, 144 (01) :85-102
[5]   Metacognition as Discrimination: Commentary on Smith et al. (2014) [J].
Basile, Benjamin M. ;
Hampton, Robert R. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 128 (02) :135-137
[6]   Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) Modulate Their Use of an Uncertainty Response Depending on Risk [J].
Beran, Michael J. ;
Perdue, Bonnie M. ;
Church, Barbara A. ;
Smith, J. David .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (01) :32-43
[7]   What Are My Chances? Closing the Gap in Uncertainty Monitoring Between Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) [J].
Beran, Michael J. ;
Perdue, Bonnie M. ;
Smith, J. David .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (03) :303-316
[8]   Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) monitor uncertainty during numerosity judgments [J].
Beran, MJ ;
Smith, JD ;
Redford, JS ;
Washburn, DA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL PROCESSES, 2006, 32 (02) :111-119
[9]   Do apes know that they could be wrong? [J].
Call, Josep .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2010, 13 (05) :689-700
[10]   Information-seeking behavior: exploring metacognitive control in pigeons [J].
Castro, Leyre ;
Wasserman, Edward A. .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2013, 16 (02) :241-254