Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review

被引:54
作者
Joling, Karlijn J. [1 ]
van Eenoo, Liza [2 ]
Vetrano, Davide L. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Smaardijk, Veerle R. [1 ]
Declercq, Anja [2 ]
Onder, Graziano [3 ]
van Hout, Hein P. J. [1 ]
van der Roest, Henriette G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, LUCAS, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ctr Med Invecchiamento, Dept Geriatr, Rome, Italy
[4] Karolinska Inst, Aging Res Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
NURSE-PRACTITIONER COMANAGEMENT; OF-CARE; HOME-CARE; DEMENTIA CARE; MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION; PALLIATIVE CARE; HOSPITALIZATIONS; EXPERIENCES; OUTCOMES; ELDERS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0190298
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Health care systems that succeed in preventing long term care and hospital admissions of frail older people may substantially save on their public spending. The key might be found in high-quality care in the community. Quality Indicators (QIs) of a sufficient methodological level are a prerequisite to monitor, compare, and improve care quality. This systematic review identified existing QIs for community care for older people and assessed their methodological quality. Methods Relevant studies were identified by searches in electronic reference databases and selected by two reviewers independently. Eligible publications described the development or application of QIs to assess the quality of community care for older people. Information about the QIs, the study sample, and specific setting was extracted. The methodological quality of the QI sets was assessed with the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. A score of 50% or higher on a domain was considered to indicate high methodological quality. Results Searches resulted in 25 included articles, describing 17 QI sets with 567 QIs. Most indicators referred to care processes (80%) and measured clinical issues (63%), mainly about follow-up, monitoring, examinations and treatment. About two-third of the QIs focussed on specific disease groups. The methodological quality of the indicator sets varied considerably. The highest overall level was achieved on the domain 'Additional evidence, formulation and usage' (51%), followed by 'Scientific evidence' (39%) and 'Stakeholder involvement' (28%). Conclusion A substantial number of QIs is available to assess the quality of community care for older people. However, generic QIs, measuring care outcomes and non-clinical aspects are relatively scarce and most QI sets do not meet standards of high methodological quality. This study can support policy makers and clinicians to navigate through a large number of QIs and select QIs for their purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RES PAPER SERIES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SOLID FACTS HOME CAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CART AG HEALTHC RES
[4]   Assessment of the quality of fall detection and management in primary care in the Netherlands based on the ACOVE quality indicators [J].
Askari, M. ;
Eslami, S. ;
van Rijn, M. ;
Medlock, S. ;
van Charante, E. P. Moll ;
van der Velde, N. ;
de Rooij, S. E. ;
Abu-Hanna, A. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 (02) :569-576
[5]   Quality of Life and Quality of Care for People With Dementia Receiving Long Term Institutional Care or Professional Home Care: The European RightTimePlaceCare Study [J].
Beerens, Hanneke C. ;
Sutcliffe, Caroline ;
Renom-Guiteras, Anna ;
Soto, Maria E. ;
Suhonen, Riitta ;
Zabalegui, Adela ;
Bokberg, Christina ;
Saks, Kai ;
Hamers, Jan P. H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 15 (01) :54-61
[6]   Overall patient satisfaction with hospitals: effects of patient-reported experiences and fulfilment of expectations [J].
Bjertnaes, Oyvind A. ;
Sjetne, Ingeborg Stromseng ;
Iversen, Hilde Hestad .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (01) :39-46
[7]   Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Braspenning, J ;
Hutchinson, A ;
Marshall, M .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (04) :358-364
[8]   From home to hospital and back again: economic restructuring, end of life, and the gendered problems of place-switching health services [J].
Cartier, C .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (11) :2289-2301
[9]   Evaluation of care quality for disabled older patients living at home and in institutions [J].
Chang, Shu-Ching ;
Shiu, Ming-Neng ;
Chen, Huey-Tzy ;
Ng, Yee-Yung ;
Lin, Li-Chan ;
Wu, Shiao-Chi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2015, 24 (23-24) :3469-3480
[10]  
Chodosh J, 2012, AM J MANAG CARE, V18, P85