Social conventions and certification of fishery products

被引:0
作者
Gonzalez Laxe, Fernando [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ A Coruna, Fac Econ & Empresa, Econ Aplicada, La Coruna, Spain
[2] Univ A Coruna, Fac Econ & Empresa, Inst Estudios Maritimos, La Coruna, Spain
来源
REVMAR-REVISTA CIENCIAS MARINAS Y COSTERAS | 2020年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Fisherman's behavior; social convention; fishery management; certified products; behavior rules; VALUE CHAIN; QUALITY; GLOBALIZATION; MANAGEMENT; SEAFOOD; SYSTEM; GOVERNANCE; GEOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.15359/revmar.12-1.7
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Fishermen's logic is related to three aspects: profit maximization; abundance and stock situation; and social and economic expectations. They think in terms of "ideal behaviors" and, based on that, they act according to their abilities mostly with an individual rather than a collective attitude. However, when problems in fishery management stem from the analysis of resources and the configuration of markets, fishermen resort to social conventions to give coherence to their actions and emphasize agents' coordination. Methodologically speaking, the paper analyzes the social conventions that maintain a stable regularity in fisherman behavior and that allow establishing a recurrent behavior in terms of social interactions. The purpose of the article is to collect those practices, habits, common interests, and norms that define behavior rules. Six types of social conventions are highlighted here: a) organizational (which reflect voluntary attitudes); b) representative (used as negotiation instruments); c) reclaiming (make demands when there are problems); d) commercial (reinforce differential advantages); e) certification processes (underline competitive advantage and entry barriers); and f) social conventions to defend sustainability and common goods (more emphasis on presentation rather than production). Finally, it should be noted that certified products have become political and trade negotiation tools.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 155
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Fonte M., 2002, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, V10, P13
  • [12] Gonzalez-Laxe F., 2019, GOBERNANZA PESQUERA, P181
  • [13] Gonzalez-Laxe F., 2019, ESTUD ECON APL, V37, P18, DOI [10.25115/eea.v37i3.2770, DOI 10.25115/EEA.V37I3.2770]
  • [14] Gonzalez-Laxe F., 2015, CICIMAR OCEANIDES, V30, P13, DOI [10.37543/oceanides.v30i2.148, DOI 10.37543/OCEANIDES.V30I2.148]
  • [15] The quality 'turn' and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda
    Goodman, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2003, 19 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [16] Hatanaka M, 2008, SOILS FOUND, V48, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00453.x
  • [17] Hernández Moreno María del Carmen, 2014, Rev. Mex. Sociol, V76, P557
  • [18] Working together in small-scale fisheries: harnessing collective action for poverty eradication
    Jentoft, Svein
    Bavinck, Maarten
    Alonso-Poblacion, Enrique
    Child, Anna
    Diegues, Antonio
    Kalikoski, Daniela
    Kurien, John
    McConney, Patrick
    Onyango, Paul
    Siar, Susana
    Rivera, Vivienne Solis
    [J]. MARITIME STUDIES, 2018, 17 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [19] Johnston RJ, 2001, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V26, P20
  • [20] The role of ecolabeling in fisheries management and conservation
    Kaiser, MJ
    Edwards-Jones, G
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) : 392 - 398