Immunoreactivity of p16 in anal cytology specimens - Histologic correlation

被引:15
作者
Darvishian, F
Stier, EA
Soslow, RA
Lin, O
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Cytol Serv, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Gynecol Serv, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
anus; cytology; p16; immunocytochemistry;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21711
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Cytology has been proposed as a potential screening tool in the evaluation of squamous anorectal disease in view of the morphologic similarities between anal and cervical squamous lesions. Previous studies have demonstrated that p16 overexpression correlates with the degree of dysplasia in the uterine cervix with promising results. Due to potential diagnostic pitfalls in anal cytology, p16 overexpression in these specimens was studied. METHODS. Patients with anorectal cytology who underwent follow-up biopsy within 1 year were selected. Forty-three anorectal cytologic specimens from 29 patients were selected. One slide of each case was destained. Avidin-biotin immunocytochemical studies with the monoclonal antibody CINtec p16(INK4a) were performed. The results of the p16 immunostaining were correlated with the histologic findings. RESULTS. Twenty-eight of the 43 cases demonstrated the presence of squamous cells immunoreactive for p16 in cytology specimens. The p16-positive cells were identified in cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) (n = 3 cases), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (n = 22 cases), and invasive squamous carcinoma (n = 1 case), and in 2 cases with negative follow-up biopsies. No cell immunoreactive for p16 was found in 15 cases (5 benign cases and 10 cases with either LSIL or HSIL). The sensitivity and specificity of p16 immunoreactivity in the detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma were 72% and 71%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 93% and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. The presence of p16 immunoreactivity is a good predictor of dysplasia in anal specimens. However, the sensitivity and specificity of this marker are not high.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 71
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Bibbo M, 2003, ANAL QUANT CYTOL, V25, P8
[2]   p16INK4A is a surrogate biomarker for a subset of human papilloma virus-associated dysplasias of the uterine cervix as determined on the Pap smear [J].
Bose, S ;
Evans, H ;
Lantzy, L ;
Scharre, K ;
Youssef, E .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 32 (01) :21-24
[3]   Alteration of cell cycle in cervical tumor associated with human papillomavirus - Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors [J].
Cho, NH ;
Kim, YT ;
Kim, JW .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 43 (06) :722-728
[4]   Comparison of conventional cytologic smears and ThinPrep preparations from the anal canal [J].
Darragh, TM ;
Jay, N ;
Tupkelewicz, BA ;
Hogeboom, CJ ;
Holly, EA ;
Palefsky, JM .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1997, 41 (04) :1167-1170
[5]  
DERUITER A, 1994, GENITOURIN MED, V70, P22
[6]   New molecular tools for efficient screening of cervical cancer [J].
Doeberitz, MV .
DISEASE MARKERS, 2001, 17 (03) :123-128
[7]   Anorectal cytology as a screening tool for anal squamous lesions: Cytologic, anoscopic, and histologic correlation [J].
Friedlander, MA ;
Stier, E ;
Lin, O .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 102 (01) :19-26
[8]   Sexually transmitted infection as a cause of anal cancer [J].
Frisch, M ;
Glimelius, B ;
vandenBrule, AJC ;
Wohlfahrt, J ;
Meijer, CJLM ;
Walboomers, JMM ;
Goldman, S ;
Svensson, C ;
Adami, HO ;
Melbye, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (19) :1350-1358
[9]   High prevalence of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma in men who have sex with men as seen in a surgical practice [J].
Goldstone, SE ;
Winkler, B ;
Ufford, LJ ;
Alt, E ;
Palefsky, JM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (05) :690-698
[10]   The predictive value of p16INK4a and hybrid capture 2 human papillomavirus testing for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [J].
Guo, M ;
Hu, LL ;
Baliga, M ;
He, Z ;
Hughson, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 122 (06) :894-901