Experimental verification of a distributed computing strategy for structural health monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Spencer, B. F., Jr. [1 ]
Gao, Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 205 N Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] DMJM Harris Inc, New York, NY 10005 USA
关键词
distributed computing strategy; structural health monitoring; smart sensors; flexibility matrix;
D O I
10.1117/12.658904
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A flexibility-based distributed computing strategy (DCS) for structural health monitoring (SHM) has recently been proposed which is suitable for implementation on a network of densely distributed smart sensors. In that approach, a hierarchical strategy is proposed in which adjacent smart sensors are grouped together to form sensor communities. Structural health monitoring is done without relying on central data acquisition and processing. The main purpose of this paper is to experimentally verify this flexibility-based DCS approach. The damage locating vector method that forms foundation of the DCS approach is reviewed. An overview of the DCS approach is presented. This flexibility-based approach is then experimentally verified employing a 5.6 m long three-dimensional truss structure. To simulate damage in the structure, the original truss members are replaced by ones with a reduced cross section. Both single and multiple damage scenarios are studied. Experimental results show that the DCS approach can successfully detect the damage at local elements using only locally measured information.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Wireless Piezoelectric Sensor Network for Distributed Structural Health Monitoring
    Gao, Shang
    Dai, Xuewu
    Liu, Zheng
    Tian, Guiyun
    Yuan, Shenfang
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS FOR SPACE AND EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS (WISEE), 2015,
  • [42] Health monitoring using distributed sensing of structural power flow
    Akl, W
    Baz, A
    SMART STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS 2004: SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS, 2004, 5391 : 117 - 125
  • [43] Performance verification of bivariate regressive adaptive index for structural health monitoring
    Su, Su
    Kijewski-Correa, Tracy
    SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 2007, PTS 1 AND 2, 2007, 6529
  • [44] A Distributed Strategy for Computing Proximity Operators
    Abboud, F.
    Chouzenoux, E.
    Pesquet, J. -C.
    Chenot, J. -H.
    Laborelli, L.
    2015 49TH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, 2015, : 396 - 400
  • [45] A Bayesian Experimental Design Approach to Structural Health Monitoring
    Flynn, E. B.
    Todd, M. D.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2010, 2010, : 414 - 419
  • [46] Experimental validation of two structural health monitoring methods
    Worden, K
    Manson, G
    Wardle, R
    Staszewski, W
    Allman, D
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONTORING 2000, 1999, : 784 - +
  • [47] Design and experimental validation of a structural health monitoring fastener
    Rakow, Alexi
    Chang, Fu-Kuo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION 2007, VOL 10, PTS A AND B: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2008, : 707 - 713
  • [48] Computational simulation and experimental verification of a new vibration-based structural health monitoring approach using piezoelectric sensors
    Esmaeel, Ramadan A.
    Briand, Julie
    Taheri, Farid
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2012, 11 (02): : 237 - 250
  • [49] Numerical Analysis and Experimental Verification of Damage Identification Metrics for Smart Beam with MFC Elements to Support Structural Health Monitoring
    Koszewnik, Andrzej
    Lesniewski, Kacper
    Pakrashi, Vikram
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (20)
  • [50] A sensor fault detection strategy for structural health monitoring systems
    Chang, Chia-Ming
    Chou, Jau-Yu
    Tan, Ping
    Wang, Lei
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 20 (01) : 43 - 52