Factors Associated with Mammography Utilization: A Systematic Quantitative Review of the Literature

被引:292
作者
Schueler, Kristin M. [4 ]
Chu, Philip W. [1 ]
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, San Jose, CA 95128 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2007.0603
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: A significant segment of women remains underscreened with mammography. We sought to summarize literature related to factors associated with receipt of mammography. For data sources, we used English language papers published between 1988 and 2007, including 221 studies describing 4,957,347 women. Methods: We calculated odds ratios (ORs) associated with receipt of mammography. Random effects modeling was used to assess trends in mammography utilization and to calculate summary multivariate point estimates. Results were stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and study year. We summarized results between 1988 and 2004 and compared recent years with these results. Results: Physician access barriers, such as not having a physician-recommend mammography (adjusted OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33) and having no primary care provider (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.53), were highly predictive of not obtaining mammography. Past screening behavior correlated strongly with receipt of mammography (clinical breast examination, adjusted OR 9.15, 95% CI 3.49-23.98) and Pap test (adjusted OR 3.45, 95% CI 2.12-5.62). With the exception of having no insurance (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.57), several potential socioeconomic barriers did not appear to have an important impact on screening. Racial and ethnic differences were seen. Concerns about cost, mammography safety, and pain were more important to African American and Latina women, and having no insurance was more important to white and Chinese women. Cost concerns and the presence of a family history of breast cancer were less important to older women, whereas screening knowledge had a stronger impact on mammography use in women aged >= 65 years. When we compared study results before 2004 with those later, we found very little difference in the multivariate, adjusted ORs over time. Conclusions: Women with poor access to physicians are much less likely to undergo mammography. Improving the frequency and scope of mammography recommendation by primary care providers is the single most important direct contribution the medical community can make toward increasing mammography use.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1498
页数:22
相关论文
共 261 条
[1]   African American church participation and health care practices [J].
Aaron, KF ;
Levine, D ;
Burstin, HR .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 (11) :908-913
[2]   Acculturation and cancer screening among Latinas:: Results from the national health interview survey [J].
Abraído-Lanza, AF ;
Chao, MT ;
Gates, CY .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2005, 29 (01) :22-28
[3]   Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina Whites [J].
Abraído-Lanza, AF ;
Chao, MT ;
Gammon, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (08) :1393-1398
[4]  
Adams M L, 2001, J Natl Black Nurses Assoc, V12, P44
[5]  
Andersen MR, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P314
[6]  
[Anonymous], J NATL CANC I
[7]   Breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women: A literature review using the health belief model [J].
Austin, LT ;
Ahmad, F ;
McNally, MJ ;
Stewart, DE .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2002, 12 (03) :122-128
[8]   SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY RATES AND BARRIERS TO USE - A LOS-ANGELES COUNTY SURVEY [J].
BASTANI, R ;
MARCUS, AC ;
HOLLATZBROWN, A .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (03) :350-363
[9]  
BASTANI R, 1995, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V4, P161
[10]   Religious influences on preventive health care use in a nationally representative sample of middle-age women [J].
Benjamins, MR .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2006, 29 (01) :1-16