Oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles: a new standard?

被引:42
作者
Griesinger, Georg [1 ]
Blockeel, Christophe [2 ]
Tournaye, Herman [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Gynecol Endocrinol & Reprod Med, Campus Luebeck,Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Ctr Reprod Med, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Luteal phase support; progesterone; retroprogesterone; dydrogesterone; vaginal progesterone; progestogen; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CONGENITAL HEART-DISEASE; VAGINAL PROGESTERONE GEL; MICRONIZED PROGESTERONE; DIFFERENT ROUTES; ART CYCLES; IVF CYCLES; PREGNANCY; MISOPROSTOL; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.034
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Oral dydrogesterone has been used for luteal phase support on an empirical basis since the early days of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Systematic comparisons of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesterone, so far considered to be the standard of care, started to appear in the middle 2000s. Recently, a large, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase III trial on the use of daily 30 mg oral dydrogesterone versus daily 600 mg micronized vaginal progesterone for LPS in IVF was published. This company-sponsored trial confirmed the efficacy findings from previous independent researchers and firmly established the noninferiority of daily 30 mg oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support. Despite oral administration and first pass through the liver, dydrogesterone was as well tolerated as vaginal progesterone in safety analyses. Moreover, no new fetal safety concerns have arisen from that trial. Given the widespread preference of women for an oral compound, dydrogesterone may well become the new standard for luteal phase support in fresh embryo transfer IVF cycles. (C) 2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 762
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   What fertility specialists should know about the vaginal microbiome: a review [J].
Antonio Garcia-Velasco, Juan ;
Menabrito, Marco ;
Brune Catalan, Isidoro .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2017, 35 (01) :103-112
[2]   Preference and acceptability of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in medical abortion with mifepristone [J].
Arvidsson, C ;
Hellborg, M ;
Gemzell-Danielsson, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 123 (01) :87-91
[3]   Randomised controlled study comparing oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to surgical termination of pregnancy [J].
Ashok, PW ;
Hamoda, H ;
Nathani, F ;
Flett, GMM ;
Templeton, A .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 (12) :1057-1061
[4]   Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A French prospective study [J].
Bacq, Y ;
Sapey, T ;
Brechot, MC ;
Pierre, F ;
Fignon, A ;
Dubois, F .
HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 26 (02) :358-364
[5]   Dydrogesterone vs progesterone for luteal-phase support: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Barbosa, M. W. P. ;
Silva, L. R. ;
Navarro, P. A. ;
Ferriani, R. A. ;
Nastri, C. O. ;
Martins, W. P. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 48 (02) :161-U53
[6]   Progestins as inhibitors of the human 20-ketosteroid reductases, AKR1C1 and AKR1C3 [J].
Beranic, N. ;
Gobec, S. ;
Rizner, T. Lanisnik .
CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2011, 191 (1-3) :227-233
[7]  
Brown J, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2012
[8]  
Chakravarty BN, 2006, HUM REPROD, V21, pI83
[9]   Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronised progesterone as luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles: Results of a randomised study [J].
Chakravarty, BN ;
Shirazee, HH ;
Dam, P ;
Goswami, SK ;
Chatterjee, R ;
Ghosh, S .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 97 (05) :416-420
[10]  
Chakravarty BN, 2005, HUM REPROD, V20, pi139