Comparing firms' triadic patent applications across countries: Is there a gap in terms of R&D effort or a gap in terms of performances?

被引:21
作者
Baudry, M
Dumont, B
机构
[1] Univ Rennes 1, CREM, CNRS UMR 6211, F-35065 Rennes, France
[2] Univ Rennes 1, CREM, CNRS UMR 6211, F-35065 Rennes, France
[3] Coll Europe, CREM, CNRS UMR 6211, F-35065 Rennes, France
关键词
innovation; patent; count data models;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the question of national differences as regard the number of triadic patents applied for by inventors several OECD countries. The key idea is to determine whether such differences should be attributed to differences in R&D ditures or rather to some other reasons, mainly institutional or behavioural ones. With this aim in view, both a analysis, based on aggregate data for triadic patent counts and R&D expenditures and a micro-economic analysis based on data from three selected sectors are performed. In both cases, the methodological focus is made on the introduction, the and the estimation of a national index of relative efficiency in standard count data models. The main empirical findings are there is a strong heterogeneity in terms of performance among European countries and a strong intra-country heterogeneity sectors. This suggests that, in the field of innovation policies, there is a need for "tailored" solutions reflecting the of each innovation system. Moreover, we show that European countries over-perform the United States in some high-tech tors where the leadership of American firms is traditionally alleged, whereas European firms fail to keep up in more sectors. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 342
页数:19
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Cameron A.C., 1998, EC SOC MONOGRAPH, V30
[2]   Research and development, competition and innovation - Pseudo-maximum likelihood and simulated maximum likelihood methods applied to count data models with heterogeneity [J].
Crepon, B ;
Duguet, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1997, 79 (02) :355-378
[3]  
DERNIS H, 2003, PATENT FAMILIES METH
[4]  
*EUR COMM, 2004, 2004 EU IND R D INV
[5]  
*EUR COMM, 2003, EUR INN SCOR 2003
[6]  
GREENE WH, 1997, EC ANAL
[7]  
HARHOFF D, 2001, Z BETRIEBSWIRT, V5, P509
[8]   ECONOMETRIC-MODELS FOR COUNT DATA WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE PATENTS R AND D RELATIONSHIP [J].
HAUSMAN, J ;
HALL, BH ;
GRILICHES, Z .
ECONOMETRICA, 1984, 52 (04) :909-938
[9]   Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition [J].
Lanjouw, JO ;
Schankerman, M .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 32 (01) :129-151
[10]  
LICHT G, 1996, 9619 ZEW, V49, P329