Medication Treatment With Methadone or Buprenorphine: Differential Reasons for Premature Discharge

被引:3
作者
Proctor, Steven L. [1 ]
Birch, Autumn [2 ]
Herschman, Philip L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Albizu Univ, Inst Ctr Sci Res, Miami Campus,2173 NW 99 Ave, Miami, FL 33172 USA
[2] Albizu Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami Campus, Miami, FL 33172 USA
[3] AiR Healthcare Solut, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
buprenorphine; methadone; opioids; premature discharge; retention; MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OUTCOMES; STARTING TREATMENT; OPIATE ADDICTION; MORTALITY-RATES; ABUSE TREATMENT; UNITED-STATES; RETENTION; THERAPIES; HEROIN; DRUG;
D O I
10.1097/ADM.0000000000000456
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Medication treatment with methadone or buprenorphine has shown demonstrated effectiveness for opioid dependence; while premature discharge is associated with adverse outcomes. Specific reasons for premature discharge generally fall into 2 broad categories (ie, patient-and program-initiated). Previous studies have typically failed to distinguish between different types of discharge reasons among patients who leave treatment early. This study sought to determine whether type of medication was associated with differential discharge reasons among medication treatment patients who were prematurely discharged. Methods: Data were derived from electronic health records for 5486 patients prematurely discharged from 41 for-profit licensed opioid treatment programs in the United States from 2012 to 2013. All patients were treated with methadone or buprenorphine. Patients were studied through retrospective chart review until premature discharge. Results: Buprenorphine patients who left treatment prematurely were 2.18 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.89-2.53) more likely to be discharged against medical advice relative to methadone patients after controlling for intake differences. Methadone patients were 1.76 times (95% CI 1.47-2.10) more likely to be administratively discharged after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions: Further research is warranted to determine whether individually-tailored strategies may improve retention for certain patients based on medication. Ongoing review of program rules and policies may benefit methadone patients, who are nearly twice as likely to be discharged for an administrative, program-initiated reason. Strategies including contingency management, motivational incentives, and psychoeducation regarding the advantages of retention may benefit buprenorphine patients who are over 2 times more likely to leave treatment early due to a patient-initiated reason.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 118
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: available evidence to inform clinical practice and research [J].
Amato, L ;
Davoli, M ;
Perucci, CA ;
Ferri, M ;
Faggiano, F ;
Mattick, RP .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2005, 28 (04) :321-329
[2]  
[Anonymous], DAWN SER D
[3]  
[Anonymous], BHSIS SER S
[4]  
[Anonymous], NSDUH SER H
[5]   Retention in methadone maintenance drug treatment for prescription-type opioid primary users compared to heroin users [J].
Banta-Green, Caleb J. ;
Maynard, Charles ;
Koepsell, Thomas D. ;
Wells, Elizabeth A. ;
Donovan, Dennis M. .
ADDICTION, 2009, 104 (05) :775-783
[6]   MAINTENANCE MEDICATION FOR OPIATE ADDICTION: THE FOUNDATION OF RECOVERY [J].
Bart, Gavin .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2012, 31 (03) :207-225
[7]   A CLINICAL-TRIAL OF BUPRENORPHINE - COMPARISON WITH METHADONE IN THE DETOXIFICATION OF HEROIN-ADDICTS [J].
BICKEL, WK ;
STITZER, ML ;
BIGELOW, GE ;
LIEBSON, IA ;
JASINSKI, DR ;
JOHNSON, RE .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1988, 43 (01) :72-78
[8]   FINANCING AND COST OF STANDARD AND ENHANCED METHADONE TREATMENT [J].
BRADLEY, CJ ;
FRENCH, MT ;
RACHAL, JV .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 1994, 11 (05) :433-442
[9]  
Brooner RK, 1997, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V54, P71
[10]   Drop-out from addiction treatment: A systematic review of risk factors [J].
Brorson, Hanne H. ;
Arnevik, Espen Ajo ;
Rand-Hendriksen, Kim ;
Duckert, Fanny .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 33 (08) :1010-1024