Estimating evaporation from bare soil using soil moisture data

被引:38
作者
Ventura, F
Snyder, RL
Bali, KM
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Agroenvironm Sci & Technol, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Res, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, Holtville, CA 92250 USA
关键词
evaporation; soil properties; soil water; measurement; hydraulics;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(153)
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A method is presented that uses continuous soil Moisture measurements and hourly reference evapotranspiration data to estimate a soil hydraulic factor (beta) for modeling soil evaporation. The P factor is used to assess the end of the energy limited soil evaporation phase (Stage 1) and the evaporation rate during the soil hydraulic limited phase (Stage 2) of a two-stage soil evaporation model. A previously developed and tested method to determine P uses an energy balance approach with sensible heat flux density estimated using the surface renewal method to obtain the continuous soil evaporation. A new method is presented, which uses a hydroprobe soil Moisture measuring device to estimate the continuous soil evaporation. The estimation of evaporation with soil moisture sensors was simpler and less expensive when compared to the energy balance technique. The methods. evaluated in two field experiments, showed good agreement with evaporation data. Using the evaporation model and P derived from either method provided a good estimate of measured soil evaporation. Modeled daily soil evaporation, using either energy balance or soil measurements to obtain P, gave a root-mean-square error of 0.6 mm day(-1) when compared with soil evaporation measured using the energy balance method. When daily soil evaporation from soil moisture measurements was compared with soil evaporation estimated from energy balance measurements, the root-rnean-square error was 1.3 mm day(-1). Direct soil monitoring method had bigger error, but the method is less costly.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 158
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1971, THESIS WAGENINGEN AG
  • [2] *ASCE EWRI, 2004, ASCE STAND REF EV EQ
  • [3] CAMPBELL CS, 2000, RESPONSE ECH2O SOIL
  • [4] Doorenbos J., 1977, FAO IRRIG DRAIN PAP, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.04.004
  • [5] DUCE P, 1997, P 2 INT S IRR HORT C, V1
  • [6] Crop growth and water use model for lettuce
    Gallardo, M
    Snyder, RL
    Schulbach, K
    Jackson, LE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1996, 122 (06) : 354 - 359
  • [7] FIELD-SCALE NEUTRON PROBE CALIBRATION AND VARIANCE ANALYSIS FOR CLAY SOIL
    GRISMER, ME
    BALI, KM
    ROBINSON, FE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1995, 121 (05) : 354 - 362
  • [8] HOPMANS J W, 1990, California Agriculture, V44, P10
  • [9] 3 STAGES OF DRYING OF A FIELD SOIL
    IDSO, SB
    REGINATO, RJ
    JACKSON, RD
    KIMBALL, BA
    NAKAYAMA, FS
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1974, 38 (05) : 831 - 837
  • [10] Paw U, 1991, 20 AGR FOR MET C AMS, P52