Augmenting Communication and Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit with a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Video Decision Support Tool: A Temporal Intervention Study

被引:40
|
作者
McCannon, Jessica B. [2 ,3 ]
O'Donnell, Walter J. [2 ,3 ]
Thompson, B. Taylor [2 ,3 ]
El-Jawahri, Areej [2 ]
Chang, Yuchiao [2 ]
Ananian, Lillian [2 ,3 ]
Bajwa, Ednan K. [2 ,3 ]
Currier, Paul F. [2 ,3 ]
Parikh, Mihir [2 ]
Temel, Jennifer S. [2 ,4 ]
Cooper, Zara [2 ,5 ]
Wiener, Renda Soylemez [6 ,7 ]
Volandes, Angelo E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Gen Med Unit, Dept Med, Sect Gen Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Pulm & Crit Care Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Trauma Burns & Crit Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Ctr Pulm, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[7] ENRM VA Hosp, Ctr Hlth Qual Outcomes & Econ Res, Bedford, MA USA
关键词
OF-LIFE CARE; END; IMPROVEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; DEMENTIA; MAKERS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2012.0215
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Effective communication between intensive care unit (ICU) providers and families is crucial given the complexity of decisions made regarding goals of therapy. Using video images to supplement medical discussions is an innovative process to standardize and improve communication. In this six-month, quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study we investigated the impact of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) video decision support tool upon knowledge about CPR among surrogate decision makers for critically ill adults. Methods: We interviewed surrogate decision makers for patients aged 50 and over, using a structured questionnaire that included a four-question CPR knowledge assessment similar to those used in previous studies. Surrogates in the post-intervention arm viewed a three-minute video decision support tool about CPR before completing the knowledge assessment and completed questions about perceived value of the video. Results: We recruited 23 surrogates during the first three months (pre-intervention arm) and 27 surrogates during the latter three months of the study (post-intervention arm). Surrogates viewing the video had more knowledge about CPR (p = 0.008); average scores were 2.0 (SD 1.1) and 2.9 (SD 1.2) (out of a total of 4) in pre-intervention and post-intervention arms. Surrogates who viewed the video were comfortable with its content (81% very) and 81% would recommend the video. CPR preferences for patients at the time of ICU discharge/death were distributed as follows: pre-intervention: full code 78%, DNR 22%; post-intervention: full code 59%, DNR 41% (p = 0.23).
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1387
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Communication tools for end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oczkowski, Simon J. W.
    Chung, Han-Oh
    Hanvey, Louise
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    You, John J.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [22] Development of a decision aid for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit employing user-centered design and a wiki platform for rapid prototyping
    Plaisance, Ariane
    Witteman, Holly O.
    LeBlanc, Annie
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Heyland, Daren Keith
    Ebell, Mark H.
    Blair, Louisa
    Tapp, Diane
    Dupuis, Audrey
    Lavoie-Berard, Carole-Anne
    McGinn, Carrie Anna
    Legare, France
    Archambault, Patrick Michel
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [23] A 6-y retrospective cohort study of family satisfaction with critical care and decision-making in an Australian intensive care unit
    Khan, Shahrukh
    Digby, Robin
    Giordano, Nicholas A.
    Hade, Sharon
    Bucknall, Tracey K.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 35 (03) : 264 - 272
  • [24] Co-design of the EMBED-Care Framework as an intervention to enhance shared decision-making for people affected by dementia and practitioners, comprising holistic assessment, linked with clinical decision support tools: A qualitative study
    Aworinde, Jesutofunmi
    Evans, Catherine J.
    Gillam, Juliet
    Ramsenthaler, Christina
    Davies, Nathan
    Ellis-Smith, Clare
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [25] Conceptualizing surrogate decision making at end of life in the intensive care unit using cognitive task analysis
    Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
    Willis, Danny G.
    Bakitas, Marie
    Crandall, Beth
    Grace, Pamela J.
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2015, 63 (03) : 331 - 340
  • [26] Ethical Consequences of Technological Mediation on Parental Decision-Making Experiences in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Friedrich, Annie B.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (04) : 259 - 269
  • [27] Policy and practice issues in making an advance care directive with decision making support: A case study
    Sheahan, Margo
    Bigby, Christine
    Douglas, Jacinta
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2023, 58 (02) : 381 - 397
  • [28] A family carer decision support intervention for people with advanced dementia residing in a nursing home: a study protocol for an international advance care planning intervention (mySupport study)
    Harding, Andrew J. E.
    Doherty, Julie
    Bavelaar, Laura
    Walshe, Catherine
    Preston, Nancy
    Kaasalainen, Sharon
    Sussman, Tamara
    van der Steen, Jenny T.
    Cornally, Nicola
    Hartigan, Irene
    Loucka, Martin
    Vlckova, Karolina
    Di Giulio, Paola
    Gonella, Silvia
    Brazil, Kevin
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [29] Intensive care unit admission in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patient information and the physician's decision-making process
    Schmidt, Matthieu
    Demoule, Alexandre
    Deslandes-Boutmy, Emmanuelle
    Chaize, Marine
    de Miranda, Sandra
    Bele, Nicolas
    Roche, Nicolas
    Azoulay, Elie
    Similowski, Thomas
    CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (03):
  • [30] Resuscitation code status among emergency department patients: decision support education video pilot study
    Finch, Alexander S.
    Stanich, Jessica A.
    Spadaro, Maria J.
    Tschautscher, Craig F.
    Walker, Laura E.
    Brauer, Caitlin E. Loprinzi
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, : E492 - E495