Policies and practices related to the role of board certification and recertification of pediatricians in hospital privileging

被引:25
作者
Freed, GL
Uren, RL
Hudson, EJ
Lakhani, I
Wheeler, JRC
Stockman, JA
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Pediat, Chil Hlth Evaluat & Res Unit, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Amer Board Pediat Inc, Chapel Hill, NC USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2006年 / 295卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.295.8.905
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Privileging involves the granting of permission to perform specific professional activities under the jurisdiction of a governing body's (hospital) authority. In 1951, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals (later renamed the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) was formed to codify the process of hospital assessment. In the early part of the 20th century, a parallel process was being undertaken by the medical specialties to evaluate and recognize competence among physicians through the creation of specialty boards. Objectives To describe the use of board certification in hospital privileging policies for general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists and to identify any variation among types of hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants A telephone survey between January 1 and June 30, 2005, of privileging personnel among a random, weighted sample of 200 nonspecialty hospitals stratified by teaching status, children's vs general hospitals, free-standing children's hospital vs part of hospital system, and urban vs rural location. Main Outcome Measures Proportion of hospitals that require board certification at initial privileging or at some point to maintain privileges and recertification to maintain privileges. Results Of 200 hospitals, 7 hospitals were ineligible because they did not have at least 1 pediatrician on staff. One hundred fifty-nine hospitals completed the telephone interview, resulting in an overall response rate of 82%. A total of 124 (78%) of 159 hospitals did not require general pediatricians to be board certified at initial privileging; however, 111 (70%) did require pediatricians to become board certified at some point during their tenure. Of these 124 hospitals, 52 (42%) did not report a time frame in which certification must be achieved. Forty-nine (43%) of 113 hospitals required pediatric subspecialists to achieve subspecialty certification within a specific time frame. Conclusions These results raise issues regarding the manner in which board certification is used or not used by hospitals in their efforts to ensure the practice of high-quality care within their institutions. The premise for recertification is the need to assure the public of continued competence of physicians over the course of their professional careers. Increased attention by the public and regulatory agencies regarding patient safety and quality of care will likely have an impact on hospital privileging processes.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 912
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]   The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification [J].
Lipner, RS ;
Blank, LL ;
Leas, BF ;
Fortna, GS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (10) :S64-S66
[12]  
*NAT COUNC QUAL AS, 2005, CVO CERT PROGR STAND
[13]  
NORCINI JJ, 1994, ACAD MED S, V69, P90
[14]  
Peterson J L, 1998, Tex Med, V94, P91
[15]   A HISTORY OF THE JOINT-COMMISSION-ON-ACCREDITATION-OF-HOSPITALS [J].
ROBERTS, JS ;
COALE, JG ;
REDMAN, RR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 258 (07) :936-940
[16]   Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: The missing link [J].
Sharp, LK ;
Bashook, PG ;
Lipsky, MS ;
Horowitz, SD ;
Miller, SH .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (06) :534-542
[17]   Anesthesiologist board certification and patient outcomes [J].
Silber, JH ;
Kennedy, SK ;
Even-Shoshan, O ;
Chen, W ;
Mosher, RE ;
Showan, AM ;
Longnecker, DE .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (05) :1044-1052