Clinical practice guidelines: Concepts, limitations and challenges

被引:36
作者
Ariel Franco, Juan Victor [1 ]
Arancibia, Marcelo [2 ]
Meza, Nicolas [2 ]
Madrid, Eva [2 ]
Kopitowski, Karin [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Hosp Italiano, Dept Invest, Ctr Cochrane Asociado, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Valparaiso, Ctr Interdisciplinario Estudios Salud CIESAL, Escuela Med, Vina Del Mar, Chile
[3] Inst Univ Hosp Italiano, Dept Invest, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
practice guideline; evidence-based practice; delivery of health care; evidence-based medicine; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; POSITION PAPERS; HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.5867/medwave.2020.03.7887
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Clinical practice guidelines are the most important documents for the incorporation of scientific evidence in health decision making through the formulation of recommendations. There is a variable terminology used to refer to the documents that guide health professionals in decision making. When clinical practice guidelines arc of high quality, they appraise contextual aspects such as the use of resources, applicability, and patients' values and preferences. Even so, they are not recipe books, since they may have limitations. In this review, we propose to clarify the different denominations across the various types of documents available to guide the health professional when making clinical decisions. We discuss the main characteristics of clinical practice guidelines, quality assessment, challenges, and limitations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines, 2010, odology Manual and Policies From the ACCF/AHA Task
[2]   Patient preferences for cardiovascular preventive medication: a systematic review [J].
Albarqouni, Loai ;
Doust, Jenny ;
Glasziou, Paul .
HEART, 2017, 103 (20) :1578-1586
[3]  
Alonso-Coello Pablo, 2018, Gac Sanit, V32, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.03.008
[4]   GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction [J].
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Schunemann, Holger J. ;
Moberg, Jenny ;
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Davoli, Marina ;
Treweek, Shaun ;
Mustafa, Reem A. ;
Rada, Gabriel ;
Rosenbaum, Sarah ;
Morelli, Angela ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
[5]  
American Heart Association, 2011, DISCL CONFL INT POL
[6]   Review of evidence based clinical practice guidelines developed in Latin America and Caribbean during the last decade: an analysis of the methods for grading quality of evidence and topic prioritization [J].
Andrea Cabrera, Paula ;
Pardo, Rodrigo .
GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2019, 15 (1)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, METHODOLOGICAL STAND
[8]   Syntheses of biomedical information: narrative reviews, systematic reviews and emerging formats [J].
Ariel Franco, Juan Victor ;
Arancibia, Marcelo ;
Simancas-Racines, Daniel ;
Madrid, Eva .
MEDWAVE, 2018, 18 (07)
[9]  
Barani M, 2012, REV HOSP ITAL B AIRE, V33, P60
[10]   AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
Kho, Michelle E. ;
Browman, George P. ;
Burgers, Jako S. ;
Cluzeau, Francoise ;
Feder, Gene ;
Fervers, Beatrice ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy ;
Hanna, Steven E. ;
Littlejohns, Peter ;
Makarski, Julie ;
Zitzelsberger, Louise .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) :E839-E842